Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CD3519FEE for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:20:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61277 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2016 16:20:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 61179 invoked by uid 500); 20 Apr 2016 16:20:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 61167 invoked by uid 99); 20 Apr 2016 16:20:17 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:20:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3FC171A0525 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:20:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bz2XQCPJeuzB for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:20:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vk0-f54.google.com (mail-vk0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 902C45F3F0 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n62so65262632vkb.0 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:20:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=WX5eC5cShfJO+VdrtxYxZIeJKQkEkuwNTAqm0mtCN4Y=; b=g15oJn6P0Ds0VrQRfBTHy9YOv1lvLZ07eC+ZsBRHaGdCPbrg+eYupjs9yz2Llif3vt uEcSU9mdoGoBlFTkQRa86on8dRLK8VawEEV1kJphOrwAIlLftE4n9Sgji3/9vSCFeo3i iIHR0Mp/+Q9QyLVBvdp4bo65/HiAeoPei9kXnHJhxdMoh1FFclp2i+CMqRQ/hDUSAQKf NeL7JSeJxbNuQ885rP7h/fETAxnAAEfDlIMc6EPdtpOWYEQ9nxV1mFI9oqxD3lzhWKY0 Y0Qmmfg91EOrtgU1aU5Gbd8cuEw3g+L6hS+72584AdFuzud6+a8Vf6Q02jQNIs78RupN uMgw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=WX5eC5cShfJO+VdrtxYxZIeJKQkEkuwNTAqm0mtCN4Y=; b=Pd1JZGW2AyyF1X/PhBsIGr2RavLcNwl6CiudVOvZSzMnKnRwJJ0sVEsbi+2E7QHGfb qAzbvyk4zLQveyVbnYqrSRtKfzXyPMfwzLVyFTrwRxIJgx34vz2Dav7F/4X7yoXfCj5Z SQDVvND6EulGqhmfoRsbp2DnDq++Fw7QbzuRupeJBlJEezKZfyw4EYrHRp62eCnR9d7w cYZ2z5RBCRdLJ/GPzwGqT1UzN3/eGeOFh4hGh5UlOqxOGYpWb0/URpKA1pskRj2JTlgl x2LVB3PPiSZpqcsraI8X0/dnDf8H7J56Jj/gjuq3Hv0IaKZ742tMYLouFFfFld4Bzmbd aWmA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FW8lgWUXJW4Tt5rI371FvAehpgG5Hbt5jsIUb6AO0D2XeRbCzFxzkcDUmbaVkrSptTuLB9O20q9MC6MFw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.176.65.9 with SMTP id j9mr5204769uad.23.1461169214636; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.176.5.1 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.176.5.1 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:20:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 18:20:14 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Release plan 3.5 branch From: Jean-Marc van Leerdam To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c1243befec8a10530ecf78e --94eb2c1243befec8a10530ecf78e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello, My company is eagerly awaiting a stable zookeeper release that supports SSL between the zkClients and the cluster. Is there anything that we can do to help stabilize the 3.5 branch and bring it closer to a beta (or better: a stable) release? Although we are a shop with experienced Java and Scala developers, we are not familiar with the zookeeper codebase, so it may be challenging for us to start sending in patches. (we are also more accustomed to gitlab/github + merge-requests than using svn and Jira with attached patch files). But we do seek ways to aid the progress on zookeeper 3.5, so please let us know what is possible. Regards, Jean-Marc --94eb2c1243befec8a10530ecf78e--