Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CAPTa7ysn9s+7Ev-+jYpQ9o3+ECDgvr9LvSzKiURxxO-FW=yV1A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPTa7ysn9s+7Ev-+jYpQ9o3+ECDgvr9LvSzKiURxxO-FW=yV1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jens Rantil <jens.rantil@tink.se>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 09:48:41 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAL+ArfVehQohbXR_5wXfUWKcbBuaTiLwPsCBk7NvG-UciwV9Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is it a accepted practice to share Zookeeper ensemble among
 Kafka, Storm and Solr
To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133165ade6e3e05309708c7

--001a1133165ade6e3e05309708c7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Just wanted to say there also could be a security aspect of sharing a
single Zookeeper instance between various servers.

Cheers,
Jens

On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:00 AM Ayon Sinha <ayonsinha@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Say I have deployment design where Storm consumes from Kafka and publishes
> to SolrCloud and I own all 3 deployments + the Zookeeper ensemble. Should I
> build 3 independent ZK emsembles of 7-9 nodes each or is it okay to have
> one 7-9 node ensemble being shared by Kafka, Solr and Storm?
> Since the actual utilization of memory & CPU seems quite little per node,
> for simplicity of deployment it seems having 1 ensemble should be okay
> since 2-3 nodes will be in separate availability zones in the data center
> so total failure should not be a common occurence.
>
> Thoughts or experiences?
> thanks,
> Ayon
>
-- 

Jens Rantil
Backend Developer @ Tink

Tink AB, Wallingatan 5, 111 60 Stockholm, Sweden
For urgent matters you can reach me at +46-708-84 18 32.

--001a1133165ade6e3e05309708c7--