Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D7D6E17F0C for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62094 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2015 18:38:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 62035 invoked by uid 500); 19 Nov 2015 18:38:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 62022 invoked by uid 99); 19 Nov 2015 18:38:35 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:38:35 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2BAD5C081E for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:38:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.952 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.952 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=itevenworks-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lwudza82SXW4 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 20ECE232C0 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 18:38:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oies6 with SMTP id s6so51031271oie.1 for ; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:38:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=itevenworks-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=oGzJrNfxT9Yrb5arTtMrxDJdoqZijFvuVgw87z3GBfA=; b=dHFoPvezdXZvVL+NvABtIEPXHsyisAxR2nXMdvB73lojSSf3JPBtlFDv+8adnpKqhG 9sRFR1a7V81rBE6OAN2ozcDp9cNDDo7B/1aOqjP4Llw/ku5IHCIDFLJ+C3UNTCmOTvbZ reR4niT0tzEQqUsc71jAVu+DMEpMwkMmLHzkGp2u9Os8qUBkN8wM8kpCLuTM4fMisxzy UtaJh1bxguOINevuZZ1+sBU8sdtzNfMRQBkGj9q25yvvgXxXUJFvrGOZ0+q/X7M3zq/C B4akRQPRxzUyVxZtFbEPfQ1HN0XBcQUMfr6i8gOzzh+GudpRpeTPkQFzG/SU0wCwy8To KFBg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oGzJrNfxT9Yrb5arTtMrxDJdoqZijFvuVgw87z3GBfA=; b=dx3nUyS3eBzQr2e/gVNH1WyySd71YWDRbLVn6UZOlYq2MNsbSW+x8XbsQgNko2Gmly Rq7nx8LTKwQ8Eog5m6QbCbRPDcaaVWKBwcr805uri7kqwweYPSW0vHsK+v9rmakzX9jg mW/j/ZmwBFBaCVJaKWTEheR6OqPDZZ4Z5ilHUga4AWrLywiQNYurQwdxxrDowo5D5TLG ab/9eNFxx+U5v42IMo7d6hfflhsBbm6348uyMFuUAwsDapTR7NrLYvjikb/t00UQu7UM pgF9WTJSsvmsAHavV4Yj0hfDFTVzTfz93HCHXNSQjLP+5rSI9TUPKxDUp0WHSzqqgIVZ mjYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkJk1ByBw/wX0HhHwn3ynbi4yMaP1qIh7qqe5BgUi28o31Izk63sv9xdbsnB2F1ueCCuZaE MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.44.207 with SMTP id s198mr5707739ois.18.1447958301811; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:38:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.89.194 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:38:21 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [192.94.66.18] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 10:38:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question on Release 3.5.x From: =?UTF-8?B?UmHDumwgR3V0acOpcnJleiBTZWdhbMOpcw==?= To: "user@zookeeper.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11379e1a3abeaf0524e91054 --001a11379e1a3abeaf0524e91054 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Vikrant, On 19 November 2015 at 10:33, Vikrant Singh wrote: > Hello Zookeeper Users, > > Please share some experiences on using Zookeeper 3.5.x in production > environment. I am asking this because these releases are marked alpha. > I have used 3.5 in prod for more than two years and the experience has been good. There was one major-ish issue which was: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1863 > > What are the risks I should evaluate before I decide on using them in > production env. > Other than that, if you are enabling local sessions (which you should, they are great!) you need to pay attention to: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1787 (which hasn't been fixed yet, but can be worked around). -rgs --001a11379e1a3abeaf0524e91054--