zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org>
Subject Re: ZooKeeper dependencies
Date Fri, 20 Nov 2015 19:51:45 GMT
Thanks for the info. What's the best way to distinguish between
dependencies needed for core and contrib?

I'm not really an ant/ivy developer, and just trying to help out with
this package created by another Fedora maintainer. I'm much more
familiar with maven builds.

It does look like we're including some of the contrib stuff in this
package. I'm not sure why. We probably shouldn't be, unless we put
them in separate RPMs (subpackages). I'll look into separating them a
bit in the future. As for license, it looks like BSD was included
because of the hashtable bits which are compiled into the shared
library? SLF4J isn't packaged in this, it's just a dependency, so its
license is specified in its own RPM.

Christopher L Tubbs II

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Flavio Junqueira <fpj@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Christopher,
> I had a look and couldn't see any major problem. You seem to be including dependencies
for both core and contrib. Just keep in mind that contrib contains projects that aren't active
and consequently might not build or run properly. You may also want to MIT to the list of
licenses. slf4j is under that license.
> -Flavio
>> On 16 Nov 2015, at 16:43, Christopher <ctubbsii@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I'm trying to remove unneeded dependencies and classpath items from
>> ZooKeeper, as packaged in Fedora.
>> If I could get somebody to review the Requires and BuildRequires for
>> anything obvious:
>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/zookeeper.git/tree/zookeeper.spec
>> and the default zkEnv.sh CLASSPATH=... items for any obvious problems:
>> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/zookeeper.git/tree/zkEnv.sh
>> I would very much appreciate it. This would also help get ZooKeeper
>> packaged for EPEL7, by reducing the work needed to package unnecessary
>> dependencies there.
>> Thanks,
>> Christopher

View raw message