Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BAAB18FE6 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13110 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2015 21:11:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 13057 invoked by uid 500); 13 Sep 2015 21:11:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 13045 invoked by uid 99); 13 Sep 2015 21:11:32 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:11:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BE6F518041A for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:11:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.899 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.899 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yIH7o5a6jkkO for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com (mail-io0-f169.google.com [209.85.223.169]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id D8738205B7 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 21:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ioii196 with SMTP id i196so147036686ioi.3 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:11:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9suS2reS4HSHlZdvfrpzjgvo4VJf9BMd6XK6S8g/xY4=; b=zcYmsPSfU/Z711ap++CDnnLhW0E3tuFQF2r36pNqniEcVQwr0p0pQTz12mrG+fTWrx dqCIUnRNDIoSaw6ku04oo4eZi9tubEamfYLERdBEGj5nz01ztrKBdta5h7lZjyv2pzWw /M0mVP6RWGMS4WVrbYMnD0U6xQoDySDxF7VcpbFkDCoFyMWoQ2q421lBWMLM13o7wKZr qV69SQHDv3IzZMI7tEspqLcdH4Qnw+69nLo3Q13sNeaLWXJlTA28PDdrLaOrgSUaS8TK SetXAqrcNv/RPLSi6+5uBEHLsXBTvCARFLFo0T2KBM51CpMWpp8wZfPa0n4Rr4EsfY+s 9ghQ== X-Received: by 10.107.169.216 with SMTP id f85mr18951748ioj.73.1442178678947; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:11:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.130.36 with HTTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:10:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <9A39BFC2-601E-47FA-A10A-BA24569DC818@jordanzimmerman.com> From: Check Peck Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 14:10:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Best Practice while creating znodes? To: Jordan Zimmerman Cc: user , user Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142771edc8307051fa76345 --001a1142771edc8307051fa76345 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Ok understood that part and I was correct on the 500 children nodes znode name example right? If I can increase the jute.maxBuffer property, I do need to restart the whole cluster. Correct? Is there any problem if I increase this? On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Jordan Zimmerman < jordan@jordanzimmerman.com> wrote: > No, the 1MB limit will hit you there as well. If you try to get your data > (via getData() call) it will fail. Note, you can increase the value via the > jute.maxBuffer property. > > -Jordan > > On September 13, 2015 at 4:06:48 PM, Check Peck (comptechgeeky@gmail.com) > wrote: > > What about data in those znode? They can be more than 1MB in each znode > correct? > > --001a1142771edc8307051fa76345--