Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9882C18C31 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 84350 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2015 21:39:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 84295 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2015 21:39:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 84283 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2015 21:39:27 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 21:39:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4C4F2C019E for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:39:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.88 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7pH-IEYOW3qn for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E709920773 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oio137 with SMTP id 137so9024796oio.0 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:38:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=haFJNgz6XHHL4JBOlRT5TuuMzoAv0HAkHc1jg123bhM=; b=C/62hOQUTHVtptqPnN/Ez9sHSwb0jprHnm1xwvMn8H0IOriFztMJUAavzK77GuXjeX Mf/cEmb5wYhOnr2rYe4tzezSFQ1E85/nlAuYc1sQYXk1P0BHRLUtns29T00GI2YAJU9k qBZRhyycOFWcTkl/7uFbFJWwjIqtjMQPWdWtd15kOGnR7LX0ly1MOkSTSGR7j2V/aM3X MSW2FyFxAxXUywajWzRrh8YuaDtvgRMWMM9kiS2ijf9l35IXLEEt8yWCU6Xmr7YDiaeo Xv64mcXHH20yY80OGtZhKtTT0jjbgbEmwg5Pw5y9zbPtfd5CZAo71D7W0J5LhQx4oyMO ELEA== X-Received: by 10.202.98.130 with SMTP id w124mr4991706oib.29.1438724308491; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 14:38:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.195.17 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:38:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <84FAFBB2-F548-49F2-9316-7024D386C323@apache.org> References: <2015080414393275398766@baidu.com> <63702B46-DFBC-4FA3-BD13-E7C8ED3FD4E7@apache.org> <84FAFBB2-F548-49F2-9316-7024D386C323@apache.org> From: Alexander Shraer Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:38:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Doubts about libzookeeper To: "user@zookeeper.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d307e5665a1051c831b24 --001a113d307e5665a1051c831b24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > just do it again once reconnected right, the whole discussion is unnecessarily complex for a delete op :) On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > Touch=C3=A9! > > -Flavio > > > On 04 Aug 2015, at 22:21, Jordan Zimmerman > wrote: > > > > If the client isn't sure that the delete has gone through, just do it > again once reconnected (to server 2 in the scenario described). Whatever > response you get for the delete should determine what you need to do. > > > > > > FYI - this is why Curator has =E2=80=9Cguaranteed" deletes. So many rec= ipes > depend on the delete succeeding. > > > > -JZ > > > > --001a113d307e5665a1051c831b24--