Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C33E18BD1 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:12:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47429 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2015 13:11:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 47377 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2015 13:11:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 47353 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2015 13:11:59 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:11:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D67BEDEC14 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:11:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.898 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.898 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06o7CX-9PNyu for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f170.google.com (mail-io0-f170.google.com [209.85.223.170]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 14A2142C69 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 13:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iodv127 with SMTP id v127so172324006iod.3 for ; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:11:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=GnQYTnnLDHfJn480g9HZj3Pl+mZfg9VBi3MLO9aOuhI=; b=bPJ0kUCclhD4mmgIP+ugJzROdN1YkIYY05itu3xu9lp1DhADnV7DYxMNV5TbFFpJnB TxuLQYkf16ZB184a2mwek2tVWiIxYeyrF+c4139KgCh7mLbECTp+0BH0LSgt8+ArBt8j VSuPvUVo3zacrc28rWrzYtxRu14vDeqDap68QYxtCYSxmygqcqLYv8viTamxUcLsvlC/ J6az86CVfNFXpTWHiLAucD7eL4isua0qIgXlFcSICp7RTyKfPsIuaO1YpQ0fqf1NdkKc v+C8gJ38rorDubZLpQoh2fUy44FLTbx0pDb4zZw20VbyiTNPU0c+7hZTu273+FB/MUiA hBkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.17.68 with SMTP id z65mr8211244ioi.97.1439903517716; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.39.215 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Aug 2015 06:11:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 18:41:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Zookeeper jmx monitoring for kafka From: Prabhjot Bharaj To: users@kafka.apache.org, user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113df448af3576051d95a91a --001a113df448af3576051d95a91a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, Zookeeper monitoring - I was going through the 'Monitoring' section in http://kafka.apache.org/coding-guide.html I have setup Ganglia to monitor all the stats inocming from kafka jmx port But, in addition, there are a bunch of stats that Zookeeper also exposes in its jmx port. They are documented here: https://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/r3.3.4/zookeeperJMX.html Is it worthwhile setting up Ganglia for Zookeeper along with Kafka ? If yes, in your experience, what are the essential stats to look out for (especially in relation to its use with Kafka) Looking forward to your response. Thanks, prabcs --001a113df448af3576051d95a91a--