Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7909C1855A for ; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 57839 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2015 00:33:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 57789 invoked by uid 500); 27 Jun 2015 00:33:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 57778 invoked by uid 99); 27 Jun 2015 00:33:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:33:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of rgs@itevenworks.net does not designate 209.85.214.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.172] (HELO mail-ob0-f172.google.com) (209.85.214.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:31:04 +0000 Received: by obbkm3 with SMTP id km3so76416694obb.1 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:32:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=We398t4p6v0+k6A/EJZ9H77Gow+fmOTOh0XcJ3IdwQs=; b=d1klbQZmkga8rDojxNXHPWU02c+3/R9us3Vv3LF1+ooHeU5D4oLh1S2PSRB8uQSf/7 xcNXiYIvtsQ6KZodTnV08YgpBw5Ngc067hD6TbCxJryAsrKJsWpLVzN7PcFFZkvdZy0X o84LGEuVK/SppvYVrAScqNmkRrOsVVeMTiabLGR/fA8KdoxKO3+rnvaIdxChel8uful1 fdHr3wc9//ZWwfpFl8ECwZH6QWtNE/Hqh9frKfuF03fsSjXOOJ3u77NNlbgwMUz+PAC7 85khoh6uxfdN/qJNEWfFCfa5u5vCdFuW0ro/72+aiuJEcDOJDQFg8ll5VwXhlenbWCXJ Llrw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmUmWaWvJSt+AHyG8kFlL9Nb2xRotWWQl6IgiGBCaO/iOTHsye0R4dU36IGUUmHrkLoVGC6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.33.74 with SMTP id p10mr3886967oei.62.1435365172151; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.48.145 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:32:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [8.25.197.26] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 17:32:52 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Incrementally bootstrapping a 3.5.0-alpha cluster? From: =?UTF-8?B?UmHDumwgR3V0acOpcnJleiBTZWdhbMOpcw==?= To: "user@zookeeper.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0115eef835a637051974ff12 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0115eef835a637051974ff12 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Alex, On 25 June 2015 at 14:36, Alexander Shraer wrote: > This message itself doesn't indicate a failure, its quite normal. But if > you have a situation where the ensemble gets stuck or doesn't elect a > leader, please open a jira and post your server logs. > Do you think we should make: LOG.info("Have smaller server identifier, so dropping the " + "connection: (" + sid + ", " + self.getId() + ")"); a LOG.debug statement instead? I see how people can see that as some sort of error condition... -rgs --089e0115eef835a637051974ff12--