Thanks a lot for your input Flavio.
Regards, Guy
From: Flavio Junqueira <fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.INVALID>
To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Cc: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org
Date: 30/03/2015 05:22 PM
Subject: Re: Recommended JDK
Hello Guy,
I don't think using a different jdk with the client matters. In fact, you
don't even have to use java to have a zk client (e.g., check the C
client). The ZK release version matters, though.
You may want to keep in mind the Oracle roadmap for public updates when
choosing what to use:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html <
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/eol-135779.html>
-Flavio
> On 30 Mar 2015, at 13:57, Guy Laden <guy.laden@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Jon, Ibrahim,
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> Do people have any production experience with ZK clients running on
> different JDK / hardware architecture (32/64bit) from the ZK server?
>
>
> I looked into the regression tests some:
> The list of branches/platforms tested seems to be here:
> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/
>
> Focusing on the 3.4 branch, I looked at the Oracle JDK tests, and from
> these files
>
https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/lastStableBuild/consoleText
>
https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk8/lastStableBuild/consoleText
>
> I see, for jdk7:
> jdk1.7.0_25-32
> os.arch=i386
>
> for jdk8:
> 1.8.0_20
> os.arch=amd64
>
> (It seems to me that in all the tests the clients and servers run using
the
> same JDK / arch)
|