From user-return-8119-apmail-zookeeper-user-archive=zookeeper.apache.org@zookeeper.apache.org Fri Oct 17 18:29:06 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 219AF17772 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12176 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2014 18:29:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 12065 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2014 18:29:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 12016 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2014 18:29:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:29:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mutsuzaki@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.180] (HELO mail-ob0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 18:28:39 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id va2so1087280obc.11 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:28:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CxQn6+Bs61YpZBywIbSlW5gqPuP5RNUK1mFdmwe+EZw=; b=d5pqvYdR5cppu8U9fEqaiFj4SzuyDg3axepjpPs+JKKi3LEA1RkIKyvzImFF/Bevob xycq8e5bCODBQY1GeGMX7bZK1vtyHwLwkmEEhxwN1AG912pJeV7LMg1BDHAgxu+CKSmg R842KCRX5uTdv9nJumyCVigNXklaPztPGFkqAk7g4RYCTWA1KHuEpY+PR8Sx/SZ5lI+w XQpup23HpEfSZNY8mOnpuUfu1ixoIpnxUrTJ+y9YoAWUxlK4NS+j4vMZehfavCJjrYwU 2vxeUM5Dak+a0a79a4ciLtAM0b0hR9za2MXCfIQQyF121dhY741SOCJiZN7h3ppjRkhA mF0A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.225.212 with SMTP id y203mr7915640oig.16.1413570517518; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: michi@cs.stanford.edu Sender: mutsuzaki@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.82.200 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:28:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5E20AF2958E0AF4EBE60C53B3267CE0563DC96DC@AUSP01DAG0208.collaborationhost.net> References: <1413552880.29587.YahooMailNeo@web142304.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <5E20AF2958E0AF4EBE60C53B3267CE0563DC96DC@AUSP01DAG0208.collaborationhost.net> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:28:37 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WZO-vm4K1_9odCyIfsnn3NsTKdM Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Taking Bookkeeper Subproject to a Top Level Project From: Michi Mutsuzaki To: "user@zookeeper.apache.org" Cc: Flavio Junqueira , "bookkeeper-user@zookeeper.apache.org" , "bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org" , zookeeper dev list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Greg Asta wrote: > +1. > > -Greg > > -----Original Message----- > From: Flavio Junqueira [mailto:fpjunqueira@yahoo.com.INVALID] > Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 9:35 AM > To: bookkeeper-user@zookeeper.apache.org; bookkeeper-dev@zookeeper.apache.org; zookeeper dev list; zookeeper user list > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Taking Bookkeeper Subproject to a Top Level Project > > +1, it is about time to go TLP. > > -Flavio > > > On Friday, October 17, 2014 2:33 PM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > > >> >> >>Hi folks, >> >>I'd like to run a community vote on converting the Bookkeeper >>subproject of Apache Zookeeper into an Apache top level project. >> >>To refresh you on the status of the subproject currently. >>- We've made 7 releases since becoming a subproject >>- We have production use cases in 3 major companies (that we know of, >>there may be more) >>- We have active committers in 4 major companies >> >>Going top level is an oppurtunity to increase our visibility which will >>help attract more committers and usecases. >> >>We will be roughly following the incubator process, though it will be >>slightly different as we're a subproject and not in incubator itself. >>We still need to work out the details but in any case, a community vote >>is the first step. >> >>The vote will be a lazy concensus vote. Zookeeper PMC members have >>veto. The vote will be open until Wednesday 22nd October, 18:00 GMT. >> >>Regards >>Ivan >> >> >>