Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8B26104BC for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:01:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7427 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2014 04:01:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 6898 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2014 04:01:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 6837 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2014 04:01:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:01:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of rgs@itevenworks.net does not designate 209.85.223.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.182] (HELO mail-ie0-f182.google.com) (209.85.223.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 04:01:20 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id y20so1315321ier.27 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:00:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vgYwZtFVnIYcr/KGPwSXnw4G5BX7VKZht74BZeB7lss=; b=MAc/jHj6jdXUhYgBZQGmUntYV1pupedKPlLpUkNtaqrPQVSrhWmFGiPO+WV/a4wi31 lXh1jFh714mf/rDUHvy2Lpd1Y1RCBzQxtKCUMSLEn+XCRBVvNXe3cPPtd26WCcHkGsCX LJY3qejaRXbJf4mDXmADrLZLgvr7oYzpUDCVxmRrMORexxYQGc0B440G5+4eN5rBm4fJ m6k2oKnG5SXgbFZwOx17ddO9ytkjPkbRZpZg9jlczMAbRzLoJWaDOVna1aRG3jt0YBE3 pdhLV5Wm1S5VV1Q2Ic5jKwQ6u+v0uwsvUU6UL/8pm4kA4EDSn5lB+81J59mRmk8YQJWa G+Ig== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCGFZR9Rma6IMxTe3xihwBjdnTVPUy3yd53elmRzRSkwI6MvFzfYO0MxXhALB1eq0PPkHu MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.253.227 with SMTP id ad3mr21800719igd.23.1395806459172; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.225.114 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:00:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [50.131.90.208] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 21:00:59 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Load on Zookeeper cluster? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ra=FAl_Guti=E9rrez_Segal=E9s?= To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134b51a2cd88a04f57a847f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a1134b51a2cd88a04f57a847f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 25 March 2014 20:41, Check Peck wrote: > Thanks Raul. That's useful stuff. Does it also tell us how much throughput > it can handle? > The latencies script will give you a good estimate of the read/write rate your cluster can hold. > > In my use case, we have around 600 application machines and we make call to > three node zookeeper cluster every one minute from these machines. So I am > trying to understand how much load it can handle. > I am assuming 1 ZK session per application machine? If so, 600 sessions shouldn't be a problem for a 3 servers cluster. What ZK version are you planning on running? -rgs --001a1134b51a2cd88a04f57a847f--