From user-return-7376-apmail-zookeeper-user-archive=zookeeper.apache.org@zookeeper.apache.org Wed Mar 26 03:20:54 2014 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26D1810348 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59634 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2014 03:20:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 58898 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2014 03:20:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 58889 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2014 03:20:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:20:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (nike.apache.org: transitioning domain of rgs@itevenworks.net does not designate 209.85.213.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.172] (HELO mail-ig0-f172.google.com) (209.85.213.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 03:20:44 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hn18so80882igb.11 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:20:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=h8I94wAJvfBiqTOkBbeJtVM2CWRtWwdKbU341OtDJ3M=; b=fssi3WsZh3sZPx5lgXbZxwW47D/BxDRPuBukjwCaroShAmwIsj2T1J2FTLbs+1cCuz W+4KG4pycd/bADvznigfpGHQZKEgemTJtaXxJGEES1OezNEfAITX+pXcof1JiBwjWpZt 8f1ZJp4B6RoHNcSQj695zntUDUHh/8lmOSlKE5MS0SeOV7wPVLw8nGvxm5esm76XTx5o qof5hceuEPzCkY9BZTxfBg454Wz4CtwEcnXeubnJ0JpAVsQrTh4o5CJl1s4d7lzbJquh SDw4IT5vMTngZOjkgtKOYjOafVaKqkVxCSexYS2Njp6ruiw2r2SsNxYy5F85o4iQdELr VS6A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQle2Vhq+2oYk9mcPACbAD5sUOgj9i03heDL3hCgJvE6vomLVYjJh5KZAgoLXDiyzbgU95Xg MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.16.199 with SMTP id q7mr58846222ica.16.1395804022539; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.225.114 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:20:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [8.25.195.26] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 20:20:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Load on Zookeeper cluster? From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ra=FAl_Guti=E9rrez_Segal=E9s?= To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303f6674f09ce304f579f216 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf303f6674f09ce304f579f216 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 25 March 2014 20:08, Check Peck wrote: > Has anyone done any load test on three node zookeeper cluster? In general, > I am trying to see how much requests per second, it can handle? > > Any past experiences will help a lot. > > I am using curator api to read from zookeeper node. And the configuration > of the machine is - > > 4vCPU, 12GB RAM, 60GB HD > I find https://github.com/phunt/zk-smoketest handy to calibrate settings on a new cluster (specially the globalOutstandingLimit param, among others). -rgs --20cf303f6674f09ce304f579f216--