From user-return-6294-apmail-zookeeper-user-archive=zookeeper.apache.org@zookeeper.apache.org Tue Apr 23 15:34:05 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BB83FFA7 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 92252 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2013 15:34:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-zookeeper-user-archive@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 92196 invoked by uid 500); 23 Apr 2013 15:34:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@zookeeper.apache.org Received: (qmail 92179 invoked by uid 99); 23 Apr 2013 15:34:03 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:34:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dwivedishashwat@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.169] (HELO mail-lb0-f169.google.com) (209.85.217.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 15:33:58 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f169.google.com with SMTP id p11so788827lbi.14 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:33:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; bh=z16ikIWvpjntmfhy6QVmJacrrbO6s1I33gFuC7NuD18=; b=jH1XqlsA5Kmujpb3ZjznMMQRA5GEuaT1NV+IzzIuypQlKbaUwri1bK9r5E5dCSHJVQ 9pY2qK5od0F5pYi9CEiVB/UCGvimBqp2D4WCmlqvjkHpi2tzQx41QmvyS7al0IaGFSlS nluKkFjeIYVPrkj6/VBtZYr6ZyVPHDY1PMpCqp/BLwIB5U7S/1Jpq1E2V1uEZobKfhhS PKhX52KNsRrqvODlJsHZkfqdqLxoewPrsOIfwkb5BjZ5AF/5R4mBKt+gURd82M6PiWZL j51M5fxEvBrWwZLXKSZsZiL3/L1R92UBtYjUMH7a8Xkehf5zA1gmytvKY+qNHADvU9jQ 1P8Q== X-Received: by 10.112.147.1 with SMTP id tg1mr3806877lbb.61.1366731217321; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:33:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.98.131 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 08:32:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130423091023.GA31253@ip-10-228-174-15.eu-west-1.compute.internal> References: <20130423091023.GA31253@ip-10-228-174-15.eu-west-1.compute.internal> From: shashwat shriparv Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 21:02:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Running a 3-node ensemble on a single machine To: user@zookeeper.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a7f5cb6473204db08e846 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b3a7f5cb6473204db08e846 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable do it in Alexander Shraer way... *Thanks & Regards * =E2=88=9E Shashwat Shriparv On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Ivan Kelly wrote: > > For development purposes I would like to run a 3 node Zookeeper > > ensemble on a single machine (Mac OS X). What's the cleanest way to > > do this? > Why do you want a 3 node cluster for development? What advantage will > 3 give over simply running a standalone zookeeper node? > > -Ivan > --047d7b3a7f5cb6473204db08e846--