Uhm, yeah, that's what I meant...
On Sep 17, 2012 7:59 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another option is to use a proxy.
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Morris Bernstein <
> morris@systems-deployment.com> wrote:
>
> > The obvious solution would be running multiple Zookeepers hierarchically.
> > Each server would take, say, 1000 clients. Each server would be a client
> > of an uber Zookeeper. It'll increase latency some, but it scales.
> > On Sep 17, 2012 3:57 PM, "Martin Kou" <bitanarch@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm having a use case where there're potentially millions of client
> > > processes connected to a Zookeeper cluster, but only a very small
> > > proportion of them would be actively sending requests or receiving any
> > data
> > > (say, about 1000 of them every second) at any time. Has anyone tried
> this
> > > before?
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Martin Kou
> > >
> >
>
|