Mailing-List: contact user-help@zookeeper.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of mgius7096@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.170 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1CFAC1EC-BDED-483D-92CC-7C37FB54C911@toolazydogs.com>
References: <4FB44B3B.7090604@groovie.org>
	<CAOYeBnOpe0f3-pehndeNuj2bGhcKsm9Vcgn3mYaAPmmnkbHzQA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4FB570A3.4070404@groovie.org>
	<1CFAC1EC-BDED-483D-92CC-7C37FB54C911@toolazydogs.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 10:11:55 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAOYeBnMhmgWQxRUZe6E2vDWuw92E3_-tMcvN=48q6BO88MCgnA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: The State of Python Zookeeper libraries and collaboration
From: Mark Gius <mgius7096@gmail.com>
To: user@zookeeper.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f3b9beb3ff48404c052a666

--e89a8f3b9beb3ff48404c052a666
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Are your patches to Jute available somewhere?

Mark

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>wrote:

>
> On May 17, 2012, at 2:41 PM, Ben Bangert wrote:
>
> > If someone comes up with a pure Python client to Zookeeper, I'd be happy
> > to work on supporting that as well but its a bit beyond the level of
> > direct involvement I can provide.
>
> I'm still goofing around with a pure Python client.  I've modified the
> Jute compiler to also generate the requests and response objects in Python:
>
> http://pastie.org/3928662
>
> It seems to be communicating w/ the Zookeeper instances at work perfectly
> fine but we don't use SASL.
>
> I'm a novice Python programmer and this is a simple exercise for me to cut
> my teeth on.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>

--e89a8f3b9beb3ff48404c052a666--