zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Semih Salihoglu <se...@stanford.edu>
Subject Re: Barrier Tutorial Possible Deadlock
Date Mon, 09 May 2011 04:19:42 GMT
Hi All,

If you're referring to this tutorial:
http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/current/zookeeperTutorial.html, there is a
bug assigned to me to fix this and I feel bad now that I haven't fixed it
yet (I'll do it soon).  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1011.
But for a deadlock free implementation (which I'm using in my own system)
take a look at the pseudo-code here:

Thank you,


On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:

> Justin,
> I think you are correct that there is a bug in the recipe and I think that
> Xing has the core of the solution.
> One solution is for the contents of the root to be an enum with the
> following starts:
> The initial value should be STOP.
> The enter method should be changed so that it gets the children list as
> before and checks the size.  If the size is large enough, the code should
> set the value of the root to be RUN.  If the size is not large enough, the
> value of the root should be interrogated and if it is RUN, the program
> should continue.  If the size is too small and the value is STOP, then the
> code should wait as before.
> The leave method should work the same as before except that when the number
> of children reaches zero, the state should be set to STOP.
> Note that this algorithm is robust to fast processes on the start side.
>  The
> details of how processes that arrive as other processes are leaving the
> Barrier is somewhat debatable.  It might be preferable to add a third enum
> state (LEAVING) to prevent additional processes from entering as soon as
> the
> first process starts to leave the Barrier.  The first process to start
> leaving the Barrier would set the enum to LEAVING and the last process to
> finish leaving the Barrier would set it to STOP.  Doing this would require
> that processes also watch the root contents as well as children, but avoids
> the problem of processes entering the barrier while the rest are leaving
> the
> barrier.
> On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 8:13 PM, 邢迪侃 <xingdk.apex@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Letting Process 2  leaves something on ZK (create a file, for
> > example) before it starts to compute, and letting others watch that
> thing.
> >

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message