Mailing-List: contact zookeeper-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of phunt1@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=OZIHY7gwcQdxXSGvkayqu4QddZnmJqSZVbrZ/tlb24ThQjSC0rw9qlhJTrurFk/5iA
         zQ6TvkDZm6Wk95dKtFdDlhmhttnlKwCZlBxvpz6D8y6WH8wKOLubUYITxhyxXL42270m
         XqoV7qcGWVxe3Rsmg/bfBCY4GUvxmGDydpWdA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinWgvN6RfvHG-C0R_5iAk1WWz0WTU+O_e+-Pz4G@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTik86AhWOF6TJ=Fyv+xS6MrBHX3zpM6YWgk=dNLJ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CBC6D66.2020902@darose.net>
	<AANLkTinWgvN6RfvHG-C0R_5iAk1WWz0WTU+O_e+-Pz4G@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:58:36 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikYnyyj6D1Kfai3SQ2rK-oZqBC6munc56PtZv2M@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Testing zookeeper outside the source distribution?
From: Patrick Hunt <phunt1@gmail.com>
To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f27b9254cc780492e716aa

--001485f27b9254cc780492e716aa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

You might checkout a tool I built a while back to be used by operations
teams deploying ZooKeeper: http://bit.ly/a6tGVJ

It's really two tools actually, a smoketester and a latency tester, both of
which are important to verify when deploying a new cluster.

Patrick

On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:

> Generally, I think a better way to do this is to use a standard mock object
> framework.  Then you don't have to fake up an interface.
>
> But the original poster probably has a need to do integration tests more
> than unit tests.  In such tests, they need to test against a real ZK to
> make
> sure that their assumptions about the semantics of ZK are valid.
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:53 AM, David Rosenstrauch <darose@darose.net
> >wrote:
>
> > Consequently, the way I write my code for ZooKeeper is against a more
> > generic interface that provides operations for open, close, getData, and
> > setData.  When unit testing, I substitute in a "dummy" implementation
> that
> > just stores data in memory (i.e., a HashMap); when running live code I
> use
> > an implementation that talks to ZooKeeper.
> >
>

--001485f27b9254cc780492e716aa--