Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-zookeeper-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 12485 invoked from network); 5 Oct 2010 22:02:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Oct 2010 22:02:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 25001 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 22:02:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-zookeeper-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24963 invoked by uid 500); 5 Oct 2010 22:02:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zookeeper-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 24953 invoked by uid 99); 5 Oct 2010 22:02:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:02:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of maarten@vrijheid.net designates 69.64.155.201 as permitted sender) Received: from [69.64.155.201] (HELO mail-09.name-services.com) (69.64.155.201) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:02:27 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.18] ([62.195.52.198]) by mail-09.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:02:05 -0700 Message-Id: <18B5D697-E206-475F-BF5C-B3DAB51130A0@vrijheid.net> From: Maarten Koopmans To: "zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: iPad Mail (7B500) Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPad Mail 7B500) Subject: Re: Zookeeper on 60+Gb mem Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 00:02:24 +0200 References: <4CAB78D3.4020507@yahoo-inc.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Oct 2010 22:02:06.0275 (UTC) FILETIME=[F2FFB930:01CB64D8] X-Sender: maarten@vrijheid.net X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Good point. And Cassandra is a no-go for me for now. I get the model, = but I don't like, check, dislike, things like Thrift. =20 Op 5 okt. 2010 om 23:54 heeft Dave Wright het = volgende geschreven: > I think the issue of having to write a full ~60GB snapshot file at > intervals would make this prohibitive, particularly on EC2 via EBS. At > a scale like that I think you'd be better off with a traditional > database or a nosql database like Cassandra, possibly using Zookeeper > for transaction locking/coordination on top. >=20 >=20 > -Dave Wright >=20 > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:27 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >> Tuning GC is going to be critical, otw all the sessions will timeout = (and >> potentially expire) during GC pauses. >>=20 >> Patrick >>=20 >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Maarten Koopmans = wrote: >>=20 >>> Yes, and syncing after a crash will be interesting as well. Off = note; I am >>> running it with a 6GB heap now, but it's not filled yet. I do have = smoke >>> tests thoug, so maybe I'll give it a try. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> Op 5 okt. 2010 om 21:13 heeft Benjamin Reed = het >>> volgende geschreven: >>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> you will need to time how long it takes to read all that state back = in >>> and adjust the initTime accordingly. it will probably take a while = to pull >>> all that data into memory. >>>>=20 >>>> ben >>>>=20 >>>> On 10/05/2010 11:36 AM, Avinash Lakshman wrote: >>>>> I have run it over 5 GB of heap with over 10M znodes. We will = definitely >>> run >>>>> it with over 64 GB of heap. Technically I do not see any = limitiation. >>>>> However I will the experts chime in. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Avinash >>>>>=20 >>>>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Mahadev = Konar>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> Hi Maarteen, >>>>>> I definitely know of a group which uses around 3GB of memory = heap for >>>>>> zookeeper but never heard of someone with such huge requirements. = I >>> would >>>>>> say it definitely would be a learning experience with such high = memory >>>>>> which >>>>>> I definitely think would be very very useful for others in the >>> community as >>>>>> well. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> mahadev >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> On 10/5/10 11:03 AM, "Maarten Koopmans" = wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> I just wondered: has anybody ever ran zookeeper "to the max" on = a 68GB >>>>>>> quadruple extra large high memory EC2 instance? With, say, 60GB >>> allocated >>>>>> or >>>>>>> so? >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Because EC2 with EBS is a nice way to grow your zookeeper = cluster >>> (data >>>>>> on the >>>>>>> ebs columes, upgrade as your memory utilization grows....) - I = just >>>>>> wonder >>>>>>> what the limits are there, or if I am foing where angels fear to >>> tread... >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> --Maarten >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >=20