Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-zookeeper-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 63937 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2010 23:04:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Mar 2010 23:04:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 64981 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 23:04:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-zookeeper-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64960 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2010 23:04:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zookeeper-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 64952 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2010 23:04:21 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:04:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of ted.dunning@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.176] (HELO mail-pv0-f176.google.com) (74.125.83.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:04:17 +0000 Received: by pvc7 with SMTP id 7so1382200pvc.35 for ; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:03:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=lGoxX95WgQt7ITjF7PBs9Wx44IA4PNsdcHOyet4eipw=; b=WSlayd2hTczC+tD0r0qRBHFVJmSipGbLDQsCqVa++sjlpoNkAaA8MuzBj/SFwg8tcj 1S7hw7Dfg7ZSDJa2Yg0AOsU47l23UtNaFtNFohZuLZL8ZLXnoToELCtjwfPjfQrKF1Aj lBrpckzW1q30YnHh45WWRjUHi+ANKhdm/Dz0E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=jVuKkIe04ggsklx512PhujdFHzLAzVkZhAtgymZ5TVdU+njRoYvXkj+4KJjS0eydWr CIps+vyHJ5twMVK1zohHjY2v591oMke1ZPFsNi4nCzCeFgbVOAtx969ada1rxDtyywE/ hFcHsh/x3gJB03HBIZPWVJ6xM8k/Loa59Vh9Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.22.18 with SMTP id z18mr1854043rvi.66.1267916637052; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:03:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8bc75ecf1003061205y14a06664u6cecf633606e5232@mail.gmail.com> References: <8bc75ecf1003061205y14a06664u6cecf633606e5232@mail.gmail.com> From: Ted Dunning Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:03:37 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: network requirements To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd17a12c1a1dd048129d8a0 --000e0cd17a12c1a1dd048129d8a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Your network admin is correct. Multicast often doesn't work. ZK does not use multicast at the network level. Where events or notifications must go to many places (that SOUNDS like multicast, I know) it uses very standard TCP connections. For almost any known modern network, ZK should be just fine. Unless you are running massive numbers of operations through ZK and you are only using a dial-up connection, you should be fine. On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Martin Waite wrote: > > Our network admin has baffled me with all the reasons that multicast might > not work in our environment, and then I realised that I do not know what > network support Zookeeper requires. > --000e0cd17a12c1a1dd048129d8a0--