Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-zookeeper-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 71630 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2010 03:48:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jan 2010 03:48:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 47895 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 03:48:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-zookeeper-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47839 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jan 2010 03:48:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zookeeper-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 47827 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jan 2010 03:48:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:48:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jirokun@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.204 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.204] (HELO mail-px0-f204.google.com) (209.85.216.204) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:48:30 +0000 Received: by pxi42 with SMTP id 42so17186552pxi.5 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:48:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NA0+3ssZl3/5jBn9ok570qyfb4SbRxrbUvsH+4qsaoA=; b=ByBfGwZ5gMWzgEHrMXFxZ0S0tH1DHTLCni5Y4CJKTDx4VJ+JYvHukPK1yE8MNQnZhE eG6jBfSzpKwPL7SoIYE/vbnFkSlt9JBavbUq263W16yg8vs+qNmjxGHDu7FRf/0UG/zp lZovLfnBxXrA2YPfVMRWEL5kWNsqWi+2XSC/g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SFFcxqrb35BC5za/Za/QXmbYsTjpqKfLa2QBEQGsoF/H2PNrhr2XUQx2J5NaVoi1vw O9T/+UlVoyENUcXoULR17YNLwQkHHnOiUs2oXEsemFGuzuuBIZkOU8q70nK8hoP+PhdG hgnHu70A+yS+k0kET8AYic5EH/5ofbTYsKLMU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.30.7 with SMTP id d7mr5289821wad.30.1263354489089; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:48:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B4B6171.6060802@apache.org> References: <4B476DC4.4040800@apache.org> <4B4B6171.6060802@apache.org> From: Jiro Iwamoto Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:47:49 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why is not win32 usable in production? To: Patrick Hunt Cc: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks Patrik. I can likely use zookeeper. I try to use zookeeper in win32. thanks a lot. On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 2:35 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > There are 3 principal components to zookeeper: java server and client, c > client. The c client is used in the perl/python bindings (available in th= e > contrib directory). > > The java code itself should run in any JVM 1.6 or later, however the > docs/scripts and C code typically only run under unix or unix-like > environments. This is why we recommend cygwin for windows. > > Patrick > > ps. someone has contributed windows batch files for running the > server/client, but this is currently unreleased change - it's slated to b= e > included in the upcoming 3.3.0 release. Obviously you could just run the = jvm > w/o the scripts, this is fine. > > Jiro Iwamoto wrote: >> >> thank you for replying, =A0Patric. >> >> OK. And I have question. Is cygwin used in zookeeper? >> I think that zookeeper is composed of only Java. Is it right? >> >> thank you. >> >> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 2:39 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: >>> >>> The primary reason is testing. Secondly there just hasn't been much (an= y >>> really) interest in win32 for production, it's not used on that platfor= m >>> and >>> confidence is low as a result. We'd need to find one or more >>> users/developers that are interested in testing and fixing any issues >>> found >>> on win32 (this would include one or more of the; java server, java >>> client, c >>> client components), preferably someone who's actively using win32/zk in >>> production. Interested? >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> ps there's also the issue of cygwin vs native win32. I'm assuming that = if >>> you want to run win32 in production you want native. >>> >>> Jiro Iwamoto wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi there. >>>> >>>> I'm investigating "zookeeper" on win32. >>>> I read that zookeeper is only usable on win32 development platform but >>>> not production platform in this page. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://hadoop.apache.org/zookeeper/docs/r3.2.2/zookeeperAdmin.html#sc_= systemReq >>>> >>>> Why cannot zookeeper use on win32 production platform? >>>> Zookeeper is not tested well in win32? >>>> >>>> Please tell me why. >>>> >>>> thanks. >>>> >> >> >> > --=20 Jiro Iwamoto My Site: http://jirox.net Address: jirokun@gmail.com