Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-zookeeper-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 85858 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2010 21:25:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jan 2010 21:25:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 98778 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 21:25:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-zookeeper-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98754 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jan 2010 21:25:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zookeeper-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 98742 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jan 2010 21:25:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:25:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of saint.ack@gmail.com designates 74.125.92.27 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.92.27] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.27) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:24:55 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so359934qwe.35 for ; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:24:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=o4Wb7JwBQvGbEevVcuE17wVTABsrS4W+SvjuQcJCHDQ=; b=nNV2dPiwIiK70M81jkcDPVU3m60haJupGY/vaCNjCymO4eeDKuynh8BiYZoITaxnf6 fs1rCTka4YGbX94+BGlSB/3AdCcmGNXo21Fh9VYK0W/Ydo8iaS8FDH/uQgKJox421u2m iMExtLR9ge+EkVuJgXEM7ilRwn8O0gZot9p3U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=ca0X0tB5MMQaWaoavuJYZ+1IsIvp60OF2hZE9vXkwsOzJ/H2rn+mDyhSUh7OpjaKhl CQQS92FBr+V7/LgNVOKEPDI96y60R5jwLm8057kThjAnCe9Vkdyfz1CxtAAOWRJlEzI0 VsdDFN2Vhpa5EHg+pf/4Ztc0kMydK+WlKUsQ8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: saint.ack@gmail.com Received: by 10.229.106.156 with SMTP id x28mr2164387qco.44.1264195474811; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:24:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 13:24:34 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2b576e6dd13e3e94 Message-ID: <7c962aed1001221324m6d4b9ea0ob332b4f956b1a6@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup From: Stack To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We're working on hbase 0.21 as being the first hbase that shows up in a maven repo. St.Ack On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Mahadev Konar wrote: > Unfortunately no.. We are planning to deploy 3.3 as the first version on > maven repo. > > > Thanks > mahadev > > > On 1/22/10 12:58 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: > >> Is ZK 3.2.2 in a maven repository somewhere? >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: Drew Farris >> Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM >> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup >> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org >> >> >> Neither hbase 0.20.2 nor zookeeper (any version) appear to be in a >> maven repo at this point, so Mahout would have to roll and deploy >> these. What was the process that was followed to build and deploy the >> mahout-packaged hadoop 0.20.1 and hbase artifacts? Is this something I >> could submit a patch to Mahout for, or better left for the committers? >> >> As Ted pointed out, yes the release of zk is 3.2.2 >> >> Drew >> >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:12 AM, zhao zhendong >> wrote: >>> Hi Drew, >>> >>> I propose to >>> 1) update hbase-0.20.0.jar to hbase-0.20.2.jar due to the later is stable >>> and hbased-platform is based on this version, >>> >>> 2) and add zookeeper-3.2.1.jar. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Zhendong >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, zhao zhendong >> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Drew, >>>> >>>> Including a source code in snapshots that will be great. >>>> >>>> Currently, the HDFS reader does not work in 0.20.2. Without source code, >>>> it's not convenient for me to debug the code. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Zhendong >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Drew Farris >> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I wonder if we can get the hadoop people to include source jars with >>>>> their snapshots? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sean Owen wrote: >>>>>> I need a fix after 0.20.1, that's the primary reason. As a bonus, we >>>>>> don't have to maintain our own version. The downside is relying on a >>>>>> SNAPSHOT, but seems worth it to me. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, zhao zhendong >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Thanks Drew, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 for me to maintain a stable hadoop release, such as 0.20.1. The >>>>> reason is >>>>>>> obvious :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Zhendong >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim) >>>> >>>> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>> >>>> >>>> Department of Computer Science >>>> School of Computing >>>> National University of Singapore >>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<< >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim) >>> >>> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>> >>> >>> Department of Computer Science >>> School of Computing >>> National University of Singapore >>> >>>>>>>>>> <><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<< >>> >> >> > >