Mailing-List: contact zookeeper-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kaykay.unique@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=lXQiUAe3ngo+4zc+a0bHPaXirX74T2daJDORzlMBc70bPEfTZNaKk5Ufjyc2dloPhJ
         MCeXB4Al64bQVEMZqr4wZDrQODiDrzVfyULC81mt1DfNgbvGwSiSmxWtpnzVHbQgfmO9
         8iYvvp8RF8wCFd4NcPYbfDRC8RCrk+bRxgtwI=
Message-ID: <4B50D61A.6000104@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:54:50 -0800
From: Kay Kay <kaykay.unique@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Namespace partitioning ?
References: <C774ED9C.2CBDA%mahadev@yahoo-inc.com>
	 <C72096F2-F636-4713-A9A8-2F1B8E26ECC8@yahoo-inc.com>
	 <4B50D3C9.2040003@gmail.com>
 <b54edc3a1001151246t7e935155k3f7ade4917d93eff@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b54edc3a1001151246t7e935155k3f7ade4917d93eff@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

ZOOKEEPER-646 in place.


On 1/15/10 12:46 PM, Henry Robinson wrote:
> Sounds like it is definitely worth a JIRA - please do create one!
> Keeping the discussion together can focus it, and is much more likely
> to lead to patches :)
>
> Henry
>
> 2010/1/15 Kay Kay<kaykay.unique@gmail.com>:
>    
>> Thanks Mahadev /  Flavio for the pointers.
>>
>> There are definitely some practical scenarions  that we feel would be useful
>> with this / that I should be able to put down over the w/e .
>>
>> Curious ,  does this warrant a jira to consolidate the discussion to keep in
>> one place ? I had been trying to gather bits and pieces from various sources
>> .
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/15/10 1:17 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
>>      
>>> Hi, Mahadev said it all, we have been thinking about it for a while, but
>>> haven't had time to work on it. I also don't think we have a jira open for
>>> it; at least I couldn't find one. But, we did put together some comments:
>>>
>>>     http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/PartitionedZookeeper
>>>
>>> One of the main issues we have observed there is that partitioning will
>>> force us to change our consistency guarantees, which is far from ideal.
>>> However, some users seem to be ok with it, but I'm not sure we have
>>> agreement.
>>>
>>> In any case, please feel free to contribute or simply express your
>>> interests so that we can take them into account.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Flavio
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:49 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Hi kay,
>>>>   the namespace partitioning in zookeeper has been on a back burner for a
>>>> long time. There isnt any jira open on it. There had been some
>>>> discussions
>>>> on this but no real work. Flavio/Ben have had this on there minds for a
>>>> while but no real work/proposal is out yet.
>>>>
>>>> May I know is this something you are looking for in production?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> mahadev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/14/10 3:38 PM, "Kay Kay"<kaykay.unique@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> Digging up some old tickets + search results - I am trying to understand
>>>>> what current state is , w.r.t support for namespace partitioning in
>>>>> zookeeper.  Is it already in / any tickets-mailing lists to understand
>>>>> the current state.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>          
>>>
>>>        
>>
>>      
>