Mailing-List: contact zookeeper-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kaykay.unique@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.223 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=kPwvHtcwb/Dq6Euv3UvY8QJ+8KVKRwbl4gNMxXZoT1KM43wg6psE3P19wDakTGAdws
         34g5mzY6Ch5GqTPmS/yawkwpxtqv8tbaCq/FiYZ8CTghYr4KCxN1rhuOzQL8elboMidk
         m69kKtK2TtDW2d7AKEXtBGk/MNbvUG51AWbxM=
Message-ID: <4B50D3C9.2040003@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:44:57 -0800
From: Kay Kay <kaykay.unique@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Namespace partitioning ?
References: <C774ED9C.2CBDA%mahadev@yahoo-inc.com>
 <C72096F2-F636-4713-A9A8-2F1B8E26ECC8@yahoo-inc.com>
In-Reply-To: <C72096F2-F636-4713-A9A8-2F1B8E26ECC8@yahoo-inc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks Mahadev /  Flavio for the pointers.

There are definitely some practical scenarions  that we feel would be 
useful with this / that I should be able to put down over the w/e .

Curious ,  does this warrant a jira to consolidate the discussion to 
keep in one place ? I had been trying to gather bits and pieces from 
various sources .


On 1/15/10 1:17 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> Hi, Mahadev said it all, we have been thinking about it for a while, 
> but haven't had time to work on it. I also don't think we have a jira 
> open for it; at least I couldn't find one. But, we did put together 
> some comments:
>
>     http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/PartitionedZookeeper
>
> One of the main issues we have observed there is that partitioning 
> will force us to change our consistency guarantees, which is far from 
> ideal. However, some users seem to be ok with it, but I'm not sure we 
> have agreement.
>
> In any case, please feel free to contribute or simply express your 
> interests so that we can take them into account.
>
> Thanks,
> -Flavio
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:49 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
>
>> Hi kay,
>>  the namespace partitioning in zookeeper has been on a back burner for a
>> long time. There isnt any jira open on it. There had been some 
>> discussions
>> on this but no real work. Flavio/Ben have had this on there minds for a
>> while but no real work/proposal is out yet.
>>
>> May I know is this something you are looking for in production?
>>
>> Thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>>
>> On 1/14/10 3:38 PM, "Kay Kay" <kaykay.unique@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Digging up some old tickets + search results - I am trying to 
>>> understand
>>> what current state is , w.r.t support for namespace partitioning in
>>> zookeeper.  Is it already in / any tickets-mailing lists to understand
>>> the current state.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>