zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mahadev Konar <maha...@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup
Date Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:12:45 GMT
Unfortunately no.. We are planning to deploy 3.3 as the first version on
maven repo.


Thanks
mahadev


On 1/22/10 12:58 PM, "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunning@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is ZK 3.2.2 in a maven repository somewhere?
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com>
> Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup
> To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
> 
> 
> Neither hbase 0.20.2 nor zookeeper (any version) appear to be in a
> maven repo at this point, so Mahout would have to roll and deploy
> these. What was the process that was followed to build and deploy the
> mahout-packaged hadoop 0.20.1 and hbase artifacts? Is this something I
> could submit a patch to Mahout for, or better left for the committers?
> 
> As Ted pointed out, yes the release of zk is 3.2.2
> 
> Drew
> 
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:12 AM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhendong@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi Drew,
>> 
>> I propose to
>> 1) update hbase-0.20.0.jar to hbase-0.20.2.jar due to the later is stable
>> and hbased-platform is based on this version,
>> 
>> 2) and add zookeeper-3.2.1.jar.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Zhendong
>> 
>> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhendong@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Drew,
>>> 
>>> Including a source code in snapshots that will be great.
>>> 
>>> Currently, the HDFS reader does not work in 0.20.2. Without source code,
>>> it's not convenient for me to debug the code.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Zhendong
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Drew Farris <drew.farris@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I wonder if we can get the hadoop people to include source jars with
>>>> their snapshots?
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Sean Owen <srowen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I need a fix after 0.20.1, that's the primary reason. As a bonus, we
>>>>> don't have to maintain our own version. The downside is relying on a
>>>>> SNAPSHOT, but seems worth it to me.
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:02 PM, zhao zhendong <zhaozhendong@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Thanks Drew,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1 for me to maintain a stable hadoop release, such as 0.20.1. The
>>>> reason is
>>>>>> obvious :)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Zhendong
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>> 
>>> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim)
>>> 
>>> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>>
>>> 
>>> Department of Computer Science
>>> School of Computing
>>> National University of Singapore
>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> <><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<<
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim)
>> 
>> <><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>>
>> 
>> Department of Computer Science
>> School of Computing
>> National University of Singapore
>> 
>>>>>>>>> <><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<<
>> 
> 
> 


Mime
View raw message