Thanks Mahadev / Flavio for the pointers.
There are definitely some practical scenarions that we feel would be
useful with this / that I should be able to put down over the w/e .
Curious , does this warrant a jira to consolidate the discussion to
keep in one place ? I had been trying to gather bits and pieces from
various sources .
On 1/15/10 1:17 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote:
> Hi, Mahadev said it all, we have been thinking about it for a while,
> but haven't had time to work on it. I also don't think we have a jira
> open for it; at least I couldn't find one. But, we did put together
> some comments:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/PartitionedZookeeper
>
> One of the main issues we have observed there is that partitioning
> will force us to change our consistency guarantees, which is far from
> ideal. However, some users seem to be ok with it, but I'm not sure we
> have agreement.
>
> In any case, please feel free to contribute or simply express your
> interests so that we can take them into account.
>
> Thanks,
> -Flavio
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2010, at 12:49 AM, Mahadev Konar wrote:
>
>> Hi kay,
>> the namespace partitioning in zookeeper has been on a back burner for a
>> long time. There isnt any jira open on it. There had been some
>> discussions
>> on this but no real work. Flavio/Ben have had this on there minds for a
>> while but no real work/proposal is out yet.
>>
>> May I know is this something you are looking for in production?
>>
>> Thanks
>> mahadev
>>
>>
>> On 1/14/10 3:38 PM, "Kay Kay" <kaykay.unique@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Digging up some old tickets + search results - I am trying to
>>> understand
>>> what current state is , w.r.t support for namespace partitioning in
>>> zookeeper. Is it already in / any tickets-mailing lists to understand
>>> the current state.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
|