Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-zookeeper-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 2306 invoked from network); 11 Nov 2009 18:50:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Nov 2009 18:50:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 14188 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 18:50:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hadoop-zookeeper-user-archive@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14156 invoked by uid 500); 11 Nov 2009 18:50:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zookeeper-user-help@hadoop.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Received: (qmail 14142 invoked by uid 99); 11 Nov 2009 18:50:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:50:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [69.147.107.20] (HELO mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com) (69.147.107.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:50:50 +0000 Received: from [10.72.244.107] (snvvpn1-10-72-244-c107.hq.corp.yahoo.com [10.72.244.107]) by mrout1-b.corp.re1.yahoo.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/y.out) with ESMTP id nABInuV0031803; Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:49:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4AFB0754.3040701@apache.org> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:49:56 -0800 From: Patrick Hunt User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Some thoughts on Zookeeper after using it for a while in the CXF/DOSGi subproject References: <4A2009B1.3030603@yahoo-inc.com> <4AFA52C9.3000803@apache.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Seriously though, if you do pick this up feel free to ping us if you have questions. 425 should be easy for you (it's just updating the build.xml afaict?) but 575 is a bit tricky. We've removed some sysexits where it's been simple, however at least one of the ones that's left is tricky - the tricky part being to ensure the "server" shuts down in the case of catastrophic failure (failfast). I'd love to see these two jiras go in. Thanks! Patrick davidb@apache.org wrote: > Ok - I get the message :) > Let me see if I can do some experimenting around running the zookeeper > server in OSGi and I'll report back... > > David > > 2009/11/10 Patrick Hunt >> I couldn't find a JIRA for removing the sys exits so I created one: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-575 >> >> there's also this which seems like it should be easy for someone >> who knows osgi container jar format requirements: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-425 >> >> Now we just need to find someone who's interested and who would really like to run the server in his osgi container to work on these... (hint hint) ;-) >> >> Patrick >> >> Ted Dunning wrote: >>> Running ZK in an OSGi container is a great idea and should be really easy to >>> make happen. >>> >>> This should be a new JIRA, in my opinion. >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:10 PM, wrote: >>> >>>> Just wondering has any progress been made on this since? I would really >>>> like >>>> to run the ZooKeeper server as a bundle in my OSGi container. Is there a >>>> JIRA to track this? If not I can create one :) >>>> >>> >>>