I'm really interested to know how ec2 compares wrt disk and network
performance to what I've documented here under the "hardware" section:
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/ServiceLatencyOverview#Hardware
Is it possible for someone to compare the network and disk performance
(scp, dd, md5sum, etc...) that I document in the wiki page on say, EC2
small/large nodes? I'd do it myself but I've not used ec2. If anyone
could try these and report I'd appreciate it.
Patrick
Ted Dunning wrote:
> Worked pretty well for me. We did extend all of our timeouts. The biggest
> worry for us was timeouts on the client side. The ZK server side was no
> problem in that respect.
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Jun Rao <junrao@almaden.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone deployed ZK on EC2? What's the experience there? Are there more
>> timeouts, lead re-election, etc? Thanks,
>>
>> Jun
>> IBM Almaden Research Center
>> K55/B1, 650 Harry Road, San Jose, CA 95120-6099
>>
>> junrao@almaden.ibm.com
>
>
>
>
|