zookeeper-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anthony Urso <anthony.u...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Contrib section (nee Re: A modest proposal for simplifying zookeeper :)
Date Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:36:37 GMT
So does this mean no contrib section?

On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Patrick Hunt <phunt@apache.org> wrote:
> So far we've stayed with the process used by core as this minimizes the
> amount of work we need to do re process/build/release, etc... we just copy
> the process/build/release etc... used in core, we get all that for free. I'm
> hesitant to diverge as this will increase the amount of work we need to do.
> Core has moved to Ivy, we may move to that at some point, but currently
> we're focused on adding functionality, fixing bugs -- not changing build.
> Patrick
> Anthony Urso wrote:
>> Speaking of the contrib section, what is the status of ZOOKEEPER-103?
>> Is it ready to be reevaluated now that 3.0 is out?
>> Cheers,
>> Anthony
>> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@yahoo-inc.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Kevin,
>>>  It would be great to have such high level interfaces. It could be
>>> something that you could contribute :) . We havent had the bandwidth to
>>> provide such interfaces for zookeeper. It would be great to have all such
>>> recipes as a part of contrib package of zookeeper.
>>> mahadev
>>> On 1/9/09 11:44 AM, "Kevin Burton" <burton@spinn3r.com> wrote:
>>>> OK.... so it sounds from the group that there are still reasons to
>>>> provide
>>>> rope in ZK to enable algorithms like leader election.
>>>> Couldn't ZK ship higher level interfaces for leader election, mutexes,
>>>> semapores, queues, barriers, etc instead of pushing this on developers?
>>>> Then the remaining APIs, configuration, event notification, and
>>>> discovery,
>>>> can be used on a simpler, rope free API.
>>>> The rope is what's killing me now :)
>>>> Kevin

View raw message