i'm ready to reevaluate it. i did the contrib for fatjar and it was
extremely painful! (and that was an extremely simple contrib!) we really
want to ramp up the contribs and get a bunch of recipe implementations
in, so we need something that makes it really easy. i'm not a fan of
maven (they seem to have chosen a convention that is convenient for the
build tool rather the developer), but it is widely used and i we need
something better, so i'm certainly considering it.
ben
Anthony Urso wrote:
> Speaking of the contrib section, what is the status of ZOOKEEPER-103?
> Is it ready to be reevaluated now that 3.0 is out?
>
> Cheers,
> Anthony
>
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Mahadev Konar <mahadev@yahoo-inc.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Kevin,
>> It would be great to have such high level interfaces. It could be
>> something that you could contribute :) . We havent had the bandwidth to
>> provide such interfaces for zookeeper. It would be great to have all such
>> recipes as a part of contrib package of zookeeper.
>>
>> mahadev
>>
>> On 1/9/09 11:44 AM, "Kevin Burton" <burton@spinn3r.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> OK.... so it sounds from the group that there are still reasons to provide
>>> rope in ZK to enable algorithms like leader election.
>>> Couldn't ZK ship higher level interfaces for leader election, mutexes,
>>> semapores, queues, barriers, etc instead of pushing this on developers?
>>>
>>> Then the remaining APIs, configuration, event notification, and discovery,
>>> can be used on a simpler, rope free API.
>>>
>>> The rope is what's killing me now :)
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>
|