Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-yetus-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-yetus-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EA5D19E77 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24570 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2016 16:32:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-yetus-dev-archive@yetus.apache.org Received: (qmail 24518 invoked by uid 500); 29 Mar 2016 16:32:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@yetus.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@yetus.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@yetus.apache.org Received: (qmail 24506 invoked by uid 99); 29 Mar 2016 16:32:03 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:32:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CC827180219 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:32:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2RHrN4SEV9Xj for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 88ED65F47B for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 16:32:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id p65so34694036wmp.0 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:32:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=f3MTJwDc45nNRgFwCHwxmAGOf5HXKkSx+tWHcUO30jY=; b=d6hJVwjq/dLXpAnTUL0Q+IUh/zrzTOngHPMVzvjBfZ/eXde1N4D0kDRB+RN/LRq1zM jBm5PszEWhuxtfHqcK9F0dR9i7P9fTy7J25Iw/7YMLZoh5pdH6mxwkhrO4XNrxug7QrM Jz8dniuEdgPhcjTN+r3gueRbmWbi9Dzuii8uXTsCbtJdRRHfFVONfMSnmEJhtc5d9bKW ySgZxuiyU84cyfiKwyqLMgaSFLOwSVjsnY8tGky1hUlV87OhiaeH+Hk11s0/3cc/BtpI s3TDLy+fAMP1cf+NHdFmeifNX4urvNPcb53xPFmVsFDhrBuVLD/Cr3yr0vnhMqK+2rqN Yyag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=f3MTJwDc45nNRgFwCHwxmAGOf5HXKkSx+tWHcUO30jY=; b=gS4wUqq0j6m56J9uW9sZgCNG+v/XkZkXZKYSqXR/6wYyo6Kf2ijEelf1wFLXZXRYQN nhLloXSI3uHeT8f7n0LBdIG/E+L63lkwZgiQhrXyV0abMgAS+Kzcbr+AIEpRFXjcANyw YVOBMQmeE4vWT1jbfm5ZpxQ/HKAF867RCYfr+Fg594gzMgIKeex1VXnyWQAExgmY6Ahj 7/eLWkIaL/mIfAhdasXY0jfZIfAI2IJ1rgdSWeUmr+QZSi/PjvTMq8cN4N9fZ1Sj6shb Nm6IE07KYF/FBSKdAxtuJD73jvvEKFcFgC4jfLZ0qlb8sbZs3QB0WRBMXiy5qCX+En8Z 4fYQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJuA/rYLcrd79dKMqY89qAAzJWv0mat5AoJv85SH2kKWRbGcLui9eG6IO8g2Faqjag9qMK3Lykwn7nwSA== X-Received: by 10.28.95.131 with SMTP id t125mr18161226wmb.80.1459269102716; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:31:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.19.135 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:31:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Andrew Bayer Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 09:31:23 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Branch for YETUS-156 To: dev@yetus.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a44067fd1e6052f32906c --001a114a44067fd1e6052f32906c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Branch away, I say. Also I rhyme apparently. A. On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > Hey gang. > > YETUS-156=E2=80=99s purpose is to give Yetus the ability to act a= s > daily/nightly/whateverly build driver for CI systems. This way, Yetus=E2= =80=99 > reporting could be part of the CI process rather than just digging throug= h > mountains of logs looking for errors. The vast majority of changes are > purely cosmetic [yay!] but there are quite a few of them to clean up. > > > Given: > > * that we don=E2=80=99t have a branch policy (at least, t= hat I=E2=80=99m > aware of=E2=80=A6.) > * YETUS-156 is working well enough in my tests for people > to start playing with it > * YETUS-156 is probably reaching the point where it is > =E2=80=98too big to review=E2=80=99 (~40k at last rebase) > > I think it might be useful to setup a branch for YETUS-156, > preferably with a CTRTM (commit then review then merge)-type policy. Thi= s > would give others a chance to play, break it up into a reviewable state, > give me a chance to fix bugs quickly while still providing protection to > master if the 0.3.0 train decides to leave before this is ready. > > In the mean time, I=E2=80=99ve changed YETUS-156 to be an umbrell= a, if > just for my own sanity. > > Any thoughts? > > Thanks! --001a114a44067fd1e6052f32906c--