Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-yetus-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-yetus-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 581AD19366 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 19:03:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27550 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2016 19:03:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-yetus-dev-archive@yetus.apache.org Received: (qmail 27504 invoked by uid 500); 4 Mar 2016 19:03:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@yetus.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@yetus.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@yetus.apache.org Received: (qmail 27493 invoked by uid 99); 4 Mar 2016 19:03:47 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 19:03:47 +0000 Received: from dhcp-205.private.iobm.com (nat.iobm.com [64.142.69.92]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 0E4201A010E for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2016 19:03:46 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.2.0-RC2 From: Allen Wittenauer In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 11:03:45 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <71E2062A-5DB9-410B-A4DF-6E18DF7EF495@apache.org> References: To: dev@yetus.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) The LICENSE and NOTICE files are intentionally different between the = source and binary tar balls as a result of YETUS-236. > On Mar 4, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Chris Nauroth = wrote: >=20 > Sorry, but -1 (binding). >=20 > The LICENSE file is different in the source tarball vs. the binary > tarball. In the binary tarball, LICENSE is missing the additional > licenses at the bottom after the Apache license. I looked back on = RC1, > and it had the same problem, but I failed to catch it during the RC1 = vote. > I looked back on the Yetus 0.1.0 release, and in there, the source and > binary tarballs have an identical LICENSE file. That likely indicates > something changed in the build and release process after 0.1.0 to = cause > this. >=20 > Actually, I just checked NOTICE, and that has a similar problem too. >=20 > --Chris Nauroth >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 3/3/16, 5:02 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" = > wrote: >=20 >> Artifacts are available: >>=20 >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/yetus/0.2.0-RC2/ >>=20 >> As of this vote the relevant md5 hashes are: >>=20 >> MD5 (CHANGES.md) =3D 268289c713c76238a6e385297ebdb8b6 >> MD5 (RELEASENOTES.md) =3D 777ed0c88a711c8e887061dbaa64e59b >> MD5 (yetus-0.2.0-bin.tar.gz) =3D 9105ffbfb0cae689fc9ede6d6b0dcf8d >> MD5 (yetus-0.2.0-src.tar.gz) =3D 1b41e692df3b349c760f2ab3ae6d2888 >>=20 >> Source repository commit: df5627009e28f4712f7626a948b02200fb5541b1 >>=20 >> Our KEYS file is at: = https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/yetus/KEYS >> All artifacts are signed with my key (E846DF38) >>=20 >> JIRA version: http://s.apache.org/yetus-0.2.0-jira >>=20 >> Please take a few minutes to verify the release[1] and vote on = releasing >> it: >>=20 >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Yetus 0.2.0 >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >>=20 >> Vote will be subject to Majority Approval[2] and will close at = 12:00PM >> (noon) >> UTC on Monday, March 7th, 2016[3]. >>=20 >> [1]: http://www.apache.org/info/verification.html >> [2]: https://www.apache.org/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval >> [3]: to find this in your local timezone see: >> http://s.apache.org/yetus-0.2.0-rc2-close >=20