yetus-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Nauroth <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Yetus 0.2.0-RC2
Date Fri, 04 Mar 2016 18:50:09 GMT
Sorry, but -1 (binding).

The LICENSE file is different in the source tarball vs. the binary
tarball.  In the binary tarball, LICENSE is missing the additional
licenses at the bottom after the Apache license.  I looked back on RC1,
and it had the same problem, but I failed to catch it during the RC1 vote.
 I looked back on the Yetus 0.1.0 release, and in there, the source and
binary tarballs have an identical LICENSE file.  That likely indicates
something changed in the build and release process after 0.1.0 to cause

Actually, I just checked NOTICE, and that has a similar problem too.

--Chris Nauroth

On 3/3/16, 5:02 PM, "Allen Wittenauer" <>

>Artifacts are available:
>As of this vote the relevant md5 hashes are:
>MD5 ( = 268289c713c76238a6e385297ebdb8b6
>MD5 ( = 777ed0c88a711c8e887061dbaa64e59b
>MD5 (yetus-0.2.0-bin.tar.gz) = 9105ffbfb0cae689fc9ede6d6b0dcf8d
>MD5 (yetus-0.2.0-src.tar.gz) = 1b41e692df3b349c760f2ab3ae6d2888
>Source repository commit: df5627009e28f4712f7626a948b02200fb5541b1
>Our KEYS file is at:
>All artifacts are signed with my key (E846DF38)
>JIRA version:
>Please take a few minutes to verify the release[1] and vote on releasing
>[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Yetus 0.2.0
>[ ] +0 no opinion
>[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>Vote will be subject to Majority Approval[2] and will close at 12:00PM
>UTC on Monday, March 7th, 2016[3].
>[3]: to find this in your local timezone see:

View raw message