www-legal-discuss mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jan Lahoda (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-390) Using gcc and libstdc++
Date Fri, 22 Jun 2018 15:58:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16520528#comment-16520528

Jan Lahoda commented on LEGAL-390:

[~bayard], yes, I think your summary is correct. (I apologize for belated reply.)

> Using gcc and libstdc++
> -----------------------
>                 Key: LEGAL-390
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-390
>             Project: Legal Discuss
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Jan Lahoda
>            Priority: Major
> The NetBeans podling has a component (native Windows launchers) that need to be built
using a C/C++ compiler. The current idea for building it is using gcc via MinGW. The component
depends on libsdtc++, and also on libgcc, as it is built using gcc. The question is whether
we can distribute the binary outcome as a convenience binary under Apache license. Besides
the standard license for libstdc++ and libgcc (which I believe is GPLv3), there is also "GCC
> [https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/license.html]
> which may allow such distribution.
> It has been requested here:
> [https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/42964768db94cfdfff30970f2300a6e2cf4e558ecd551c1992a774fa@%3Cdev.netbeans.apache.org%3E]
> that:
> —
> As for libstdc++ which I assume is a required GPL dependency, if you think there is a
valid exception it should be documented at
> [http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html]
> or derived from information found there, or maybe in a LEGAL jira ticket that clarifies
> —
> Thanks for any help!

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org

View raw message