Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.178 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=U1JYjBJrA2eK7fQV2A373JitMtqd0ojagCG49YOcRtTSR0xs+V0sfADgtUOxWFnLFL
         XQ2HIBx7lAlE48YQXRNadhSdL8j1NHGXrKYlqbXfRoxkbO0IhgChLYYIDz1+/toUzZEQ
         sKku1bRO67KFTKOQaWv0DaN4jFuX7bkYKexBI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <876303.75996.qm@web27801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <AANLkTikn=e1_qEabHTrnkFj-H66V28giB7=g00LPAFHk@mail.gmail.com>
	<876303.75996.qm@web27801.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:51:49 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTin78Z_nVCVfXTSC7AXWmaH7c7EuHbTc=bmAWZJf@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cobertura's view of the apache license versus the GPL
From: Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
To: legal-discuss@apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Mark,

I've sent them an email message proposing that they change their page
to say that they grant the AL 1.1 license to any use of cobertura in
an open source build tool. That struck me as the fairest solution to
the whole business. However, if they are very attached to their views
of 'license incompatibility' they may not be very receptive.

--benson

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org