Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93903 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2011 13:25:12 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 7 Feb 2011 13:25:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 70297 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 13:25:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 69879 invoked by uid 500); 7 Feb 2011 13:25:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 69870 invoked by uid 99); 7 Feb 2011 13:25:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:25:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.178] (HELO mail-yx0-f178.google.com) (209.85.213.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 13:25:00 +0000 Received: by yxe42 with SMTP id 42so1842185yxe.23 for ; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 05:24:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6mdvv160Bwv145oQAH0oeaL7h5s16henKBGyLwf7wjQ=; b=A1rFgyFsc2mXfUUDlT0hXdmADPfiDTESkFdiGT095rfNvdPftku7YBTJf/Urm9n3eG 9Lb+uXVGDJAbETdaoh9guFNsjpEIUpz56zgzrpzW00XQnD448F2Pv33mOvoSXgyc4CJ9 WXuJiGX5GcFIo3EGGa96ZtwS5yJfriI+kw1M0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=r28jX2Yc2urrcYQTDsf2fUDMRlUEtnSubGUqbX0jhoRKbUC/LI2QROYoTAJZ39w45k 5sZhXjrFWUgSRlUGOilrbGWcqQXBEACHnl1TD6edgmcny13BjAhnA5G+CliXHwQJnb+g NPqPNICCSqwmjAgjxLIIO6EJPnBu6GWT0d4/c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.205.15 with SMTP id c15mr3534772ang.147.1297085079790; Mon, 07 Feb 2011 05:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.125.7 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Feb 2011 05:24:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1B6BB9A5-CC08-48C3-BB2F-C3CEFF433162@jaguNET.com> References: <4D4F3422.9030907@apache.org> <1B6BB9A5-CC08-48C3-BB2F-C3CEFF433162@jaguNET.com> Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2011 08:24:39 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Viability of Jenkins entering the ASF From: Benson Margulies To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jon S, how did you get past the GPL license on the code from the nutcase? On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Feb 7, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> It is clear to me that this project would require incubation, >> including ip-clearance, but as to the original question: I see no >> reason that we couldn't release a derived work under the terms of the >> Apache License while still complying with the original MIT terms. >> Doing so would not require us to get permission from anybody -- in >> fact, that's the point of having an open source license. >> > > ...depending on the open source license of course ;) > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org