Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68535 invoked from network); 4 Feb 2011 18:49:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Feb 2011 18:49:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 93750 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2011 18:49:28 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 93285 invoked by uid 500); 4 Feb 2011 18:49:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 93278 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2011 18:49:25 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:49:25 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:49:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 68412 invoked by uid 99); 4 Feb 2011 18:49:04 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.1.121]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username wrowe, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:49:04 +0000 Message-ID: <4D4C49F5.3060909@apache.org> Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 12:48:21 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: Re: Apache project moving externally References: <4D4C2FEA.2020605@osunix.org> <4D4C4635.1070903@apache.org> <4D4C4852.6060304@osunix.org> In-Reply-To: <4D4C4852.6060304@osunix.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2/4/2011 12:41 PM, "C. Bergström" wrote: >> > This is of my own personal curiosity and not related to my original question > ------------ > I do realize that the ASF doesn't in fact take copyright assignment. It was however my > understanding [1] that the ASF's individual and corporate contributor agreement is a > superset of rights compared to the APL. Thus I thought the ASF can at it's discretion > move to a newer version of the APL if desired. > > [1] I'm not a lawyer and haven't read the contributor agreement http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org