Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48975 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2010 00:32:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Mar 2010 00:32:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 94125 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 00:32:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 93964 invoked by uid 500); 17 Mar 2010 00:32:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: legal-discuss@apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 93957 invoked by uid 99); 17 Mar 2010 00:32:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:32:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sa3ruby@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.50] (HELO mail-gw0-f50.google.com) (74.125.83.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:32:46 +0000 Received: by gwb19 with SMTP id 19so246848gwb.23 for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:32:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=362oiZfN7HTgJzzukAT1BIBQZuk8vb0FZWTjS/MTxeU=; b=mSo8pHm3xNGbrfp/ClRxDfg5WysFVKfLvGH4kOlbn1l+eouCl3+T65txzPykSrNmfh Diawng4CbXsv5xmyTs2lUts63gNMkK9q1i1TRx46TcdPYzCPxsv0g+RpSifoSSbhz20W Wtl4encqiwYFaHijxgbdTBUW2VL5nelVKygIw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=oBwnHU8lIlkoxEOQF/GSs/LYqw9NHiJzVX/dlZXGTYvXCnI9VhX+okC47yZfKSgXzb rx1e6+s52cIAgSnjm3sABxH2yvk4gWnBDA2n3Ty3jwvfEqi+5ZMQ3j9wxawjzUTQfKiP rfX3BRGUhUvJHPG3kuBYZnhrijpXg7h9M1KxM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: sa3ruby@gmail.com Received: by 10.90.215.18 with SMTP id n18mr170358agg.221.1268785945528; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:32:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <28085227.0.1268775201785.JavaMail.root@thebes> References: <11944107.9.1266653230687.JavaMail.root@thebes> <2d12b2f01002212313u6c61c922jbd4650f42a8ce6c8@mail.gmail.com> <15979196.1.1267656134616.JavaMail.root@thebes> <3d4032301003050518k4b4d7250rc186f6c26c7c8e5d@mail.gmail.com> <4F9F1BB8-4C93-4245-9FBB-8EE9E8FB02E3@dslextreme.com> <4B920DE7.3040805@apache.org> <28085227.0.1268775201785.JavaMail.root@thebes> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:32:25 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1f837f136f4178f1 Message-ID: <3d4032301003161732h3a9c2960ubcd355e528009076@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LEGAL-67] Who We Are, Legal Affairs From: Sam Ruby To: legal-discuss@apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > > so, perhaps any explanation of roles should be use case driven rather > than theoretic. for example, > > "Apache Trouble finds License A is not categorised. The role of legal > discuss is to achieve consensus on categorisation. The role of legal > affairs is to supervise and ratify. The role of VP is to supervise and > seek legal counsel if necessary." > > opinions? Sounds theoretic. > - robert - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org