Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 75308 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2008 08:03:39 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Mar 2008 08:03:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 65987 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2008 08:03:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 65724 invoked by uid 500); 28 Mar 2008 08:03:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 65710 invoked by uid 99); 28 Mar 2008 08:03:37 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:03:37 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sa3ruby@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.180] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 08:02:47 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m28so171743wag.13 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:03:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=Z4YtS2jE+WkeQwYnAw/598NTfdTXH5m43QnGftpI7ho=; b=tbLlLWi3GPPcLuLY8xdDT1vxBUYTTz3Kg950nGzHca8bQTxH5LaygVhv33PjdO6xXRJ6xhZg7tLQWCFOneGwQTBfxQ74bxtMOEONFd0WfeVgJ5xYbQwSTfpv+7/lezGR/adcv3xUQ1eVh6MOJzdjNha09GT4lyYdFUMx5t3+epE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=E/1ZSRmb+ly/j5exP4v52TgKL8SsgIRRkoQ4J8JaoGiZLPf7iTZiloa5Wee0BD2dzejx1rKmuMfkAtWJ4K3FXJNl1Z+noyq1ze795/3/PxSuB12TBASCdnDVlv8meS+HMltZzsQmCwf9P99PhY5RNfaBXeUehoVbR1oi4kQL4aU= Received: by 10.114.193.1 with SMTP id q1mr3073556waf.75.1206691386920; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.168.14 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 01:03:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3d4032300803280103o3aca2c2fm74f42250325dce85@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:03:06 -0400 From: "Sam Ruby" Sender: sa3ruby@gmail.com To: "Henri Yandell" Subject: Re: Summarizing how we dot the i's Cc: "Niall Pemberton" , "Legal Discuss" In-Reply-To: <2d12b2f00803271859o3a334665i4b025ce541e0a61f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2d12b2f00803260028j6b62daf6r2166a1587b90efe0@mail.gmail.com> <55afdc850803271705p6c378ca6k6163a3bf3dad9669@mail.gmail.com> <2d12b2f00803271859o3a334665i4b025ce541e0a61f@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0a9816ea51f9cf9e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Niall Pemberton > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > In Larry's talk today at OSBC, the subject of what Apache do beyond > > > the usual level of a SF.net project came up and I didn't think we had > > > anything on a single page that someone could be pointed to to get the > > > full picture of what we do. > > > > > > Here's a draft, very very weak now I'm sure, listing the bits that we do. > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~bayard/process-draft.html > > > > > > Any thoughts on: > > > > > > a) Adding a drafts/ directory to SVN to put this stuff in rather than > > > living in ~foo. > > > b) Whether this page should exist? [maybe there already is one that I > > > just can't find?] > > > c) What needs to be improved on this page. I'm sure it needs a lot of > > > work to i) get it all in there and ii) make sure we're not overstating > > > anything. > > > > One scenario not covered - and perhaps its not permitted - what about > > if someone wants to copy some code from another source that has a > > permissable license? For example Spring is licensed under AL 2.0 - so > > in theory I could copy some Spring code into an ASF project with no > > problem. I guess the answer would be "go ask the spring people to sign > > a CLA" - but what happens if I get no response from Spring? > > License-wise this is OK - but I guess/assume policy wise its not > > allowed by the ASF? > > It remains under the Spring instance of the AL 2.0 license. So is > covered by the third party bit. Might need mentioning. To reinforce Henri's point: we do *NOT* need a CLA. We need a license. For an original work by a developer, we need a license from that developer (i.e., a CLA). For an existing project licensed under the AL 2.0 we have a perfectly acceptable license. What we would need in that case is clearance: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html - Sam Ruby --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See for official ASF policies and documents. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org