Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38996 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2006 21:00:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2006 21:00:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 49890 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2006 21:00:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-legal-discuss-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 49700 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2006 21:00:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact legal-discuss-help@apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list legal-discuss@apache.org Received: (qmail 49688 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2006 21:00:42 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:00:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (asf.osuosl.org: local policy) Received: from [32.97.110.150] (HELO e32.co.us.ibm.com) (32.97.110.150) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:00:40 -0700 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e32.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74L0HQA026376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:00:17 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.6/NCO/VER7.0) with ESMTP id k74L0HCI172316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:00:17 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k74L0Gpc003153 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:00:16 -0600 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (DMCSDJDT41P.usca.ibm.com [9.72.133.68]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k74L0Fce003082 for ; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 15:00:16 -0600 Message-ID: <44D3B55A.7050203@apache.org> Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:00:10 -0700 From: Daniel John Debrunner User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: legal-discuss@apache.org Subject: Re: Derby and the JCP References: <44D3AD3C.1000503@sun.com> In-Reply-To: <44D3AD3C.1000503@sun.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Rick Hillegas wrote: > "This is an application written to interoperate > with an early-draft specification developed under the > Java Community Process (JCP) and is made available for > testing and evaluation purposes only. The code is not > compatible with any specification of the JCP." > > We need your guidance: > > 1) Does this notice conflict with the Apache 2.0 license? > > 2) In particular, does this notice conflict with the AS IS clause of the > Apache 2.0 license? 3) Is the restriction "made available for testing and evaluation purposes only" acceptable for an ASF project? (assuming that it means the restriction is on the application, not the spec). Thanks, Dan. --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See for official ASF policies and documents. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org