Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C8D8180BD for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19851 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2016 00:28:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 19808 invoked by uid 500); 14 Jan 2016 00:28:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 19792 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2016 00:28:32 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:28:32 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4BF75180574 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:28:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.089 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.089 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=gnoetics.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AekX8kxjk-D8 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from biz179.inmotionhosting.com (biz179.inmotionhosting.com [205.134.250.52]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 57F4220428 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 00:28:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnoetics.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=ouLvkSjehmsv/dnGFEyieZOOc4nRwm43CmvEaUl309s=; b=F1a1AD+B5MpC1YHuJvDHK20siakD4dmNgJ6Nki3bIeHidyIdcira4QiRLxJqYF3OvJM9X22kA7hPhiGCq7S9WkKvzIMT+OjIz6yUCnQzwjH0me2nDVha0lXxwlozIc5VHlzUzqxBLQTrVuGuOBHTtG+XeTM+B96UnvVDqOx5F560OHwblGU9/L/WD7+KxBhulKlUwy3tq3bIVC79lIwARNn+QGXc7QNdX/FCbN13tA7+T4AqV4xU8NF0hU8j/ecB9QrlWjvvg1oDCXtbT9lMa9DB4T4eX30DaFU3zHUoK8Hq8AsHAK/Vqhia7B07JRhmOTJxRy8840Yr+CzAz0EC5A==; Received: from cpe-66-27-69-255.san.res.rr.com ([66.27.69.255]:54205 helo=Antec2) by biz179.inmotionhosting.com with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aJVm5-0004PZ-TQ for user@uima.apache.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:28:27 -0800 From: "D. Heinze" To: Subject: UIMA memory management and persistence Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:28:25 -0800 Organization: Gnoetics, Inc. Message-ID: <0cbe01d14e62$7bb758f0$73260ad0$@gnoetics.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdFOYXCJb+EPPtbIRAStN8jVoH5wqg== Content-Language: en-us X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - biz179.inmotionhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - uima.apache.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gnoetics.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: biz179.inmotionhosting.com: acl_c_relayhosts_text_entry: dheinze@gnoetics.com|gnoetics.com I have a couple questions that I have only been able to find vague or partial answers to on line: 1. Does UIMA still use C for implementing the CAS or is it all Java now? 2. Does UIMA use the file system to implement the CAS persistence layer during runtime? a. I'm curious because my engine loads all its resources into memory, but between the time that it reads in a document and when it outputs the results, the system profiler shows a lot of disk activity. This is plain UIMA, not UIMA-AS Thanks / Dan