Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: Wrong CAS being passed on in AAE
From: Richard Eckart de Castilho <rec@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <DE5C610F-06A1-4342-8870-C8795AD04282@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 21:12:22 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <796F4179-7ABC-4315-8F98-162A44AB95B4@apache.org>
References: <DE5C610F-06A1-4342-8870-C8795AD04282@gmx.net>
To: user@uima.apache.org

What signature of SimplePipeline do you use? The one based on =
AnalysisEngine or the one based on AnalysisEngineDescription?

Cheers,

-- Richard

On 26.08.2015, at 21:07, Martin Wunderlich <martin_wu@gmx.net> wrote:

> Hi all,=20
>=20
> I am running a SimplePipeline which consists of a Reader and two =
Aggregate Analysis Engines. The output CAS of the first AAE is meant to =
feed into the second AAE. However, I find that even though the output of =
the first AAE is correct, it is different from the input to the second =
AAE. I have verified this by writing to XMI as the last step of AAE 1 =
and the first step of AAE 2. In AAE 1 I have a CAS merger as the final =
step and a flow controller which is set to drop the input CAS to the =
merger. This is working fine: Only the merged CAS remains after the =
merge step. And yet, the input CAS to AAE 2 is missing the annotations =
which were added by annotator steps in AAE 1 before the merge.=20
>=20
> If I combine both AAEs into one super-AAE and add this one to the =
SimplePipeline instead, it works fine. So, there is a work-around. I am =
just curious why the AAEs might behave this way when I have the =
separate.=20
> Thanks a lot.=20
>=20
> Cheers,=20
>=20
> Martin