Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A21710264 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8816 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2015 13:45:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 8774 invoked by uid 500); 28 Apr 2015 13:45:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 8758 invoked by uid 99); 28 Apr 2015 13:45:20 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:45:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_SOFTFAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: softfail (athena.apache.org: transitioning domain of uimaee@gmail.com does not designate 54.164.171.186 as permitted sender) Received: from [54.164.171.186] (HELO mx1-us-east.apache.org) (54.164.171.186) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:45:14 +0000 Received: from mail-wg0-f43.google.com (mail-wg0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 2415243DD7 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 13:44:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgyo15 with SMTP id o15so152036702wgy.2 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:44:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=y8iQrbKrBp2y3BNSdE5RRr87VRZEqMR/d1FbBEBm+k4=; b=CtVNi4TzV+ULVzfFsnImagypK8t0lcF2HriY2De6ho2uptXgEccoV5r7vS9xb6ztsf AYtaWO2zvtZ60HOykLYWLB7FHS2CDL72j4x6FqXoK0XLjYx7bIpgO0Vinn8i64+r+l5r CDSrpr9bZSqhKiB76hfzRsoSz7Qm5nx2he/mfGT+BtTeyqANtca8oRVcNhQ6sbSO3TOo 2G4UUoD99KcMp8RJp7L1MCGaL0Kg48JQIZqFKNhsT8ycJyGMMbkWUNd0yHaq4/AaiD5C mV0lbjWQgZaDNVu8rD0inRlxPuUkf2Yx/gsIVFPwPtYsAYNpQmz4/9xhyt9WZYm7snJb XzNA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.161.138 with SMTP id xs10mr33220006wjb.37.1430228687203; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.132.67 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Apr 2015 06:44:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <553F50F4.2090708@orkash.com> References: <553F50F4.2090708@orkash.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 09:44:46 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: DUCC- process_dd From: Jaroslaw Cwiklik To: user@uima.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e013d0f38d932290514c91081 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e013d0f38d932290514c91081 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In async aggregate you scale individual AEs not the aggregate as a whole. The below configuration should do that. Are there any warnings from dd2spring at startup with your configuration? Jerry On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 5:20 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to scale my processing pipeline to be run in DUCC environment > with uima as process_dd. If I was trying to scale using the below given > configuration, the threads started were not as expected: > > > xmlns="http://uima.apache.org/resourceSpecifier"> > > Uima v3 Deployment Descripter > Deploys Uima v3 Aggregate AE using the Advanced Fixed > Flow > Controller > > > > > brokerURL="tcp://localhost:61617?jms.useCompression=true" prefetch="0" /> > > location="../Uima_v3_test/desc/orkash/ae/aggregate/FlowController_Uima.xml" > /> > > key="FlowControllerAgg" internalReplyQueueScaleout="10" > inputQueueScaleout="10"> > > > key="ChunkerDescriptor"> > numberOfInstances="5" /> > > > numberOfInstances="5" /> > > key="StemmerDescriptor"> > numberOfInstances="5" /> > > key="ConsumerDescriptor"> > numberOfInstances="5" /> > > > > > > > > > > There should be 5 threads of FlowControllerAgg where each thread will have > 5 more threads of each ChunkerDescriptor,NEDescriptor,StemmerDescriptor and > ConsumerDescriptor. > > But I didn't think it is actually happening in case of DUCC. > > Thanks in advance. > > Reshu. > > > --089e013d0f38d932290514c91081--