Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <54DE6A42.3000101@uni-wuerzburg.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:18:58 +0100
From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ZXIgS2zDvGds?= <pkluegl@uni-wuerzburg.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: user@uima.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ruta partofneq
References: 
 <CA+gF1kWADr9kq-wrP4WZ0yTMrNC-HLvCq0md0+Au28Bb6xw=KQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CA+gF1kWADr9kq-wrP4WZ0yTMrNC-HLvCq0md0+Au28Bb6xw=KQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This should work just fine and should remove both contained annotations.

I just tested it with the current trunk and the following script:

DECLARE T1;
"A B" -> T1;
"B" -> T1;
"B" -> T1;

(T1{-> UNMARK(T1)}){PARTOFNEQ(T1)};

If applied on the test "A B", only the largest annotation remains.

Can you test it with the current trunk in case I fixed the bug a few 
minutes ago by accident. If not, can you give me more information about 
the context of your rule?

Best,

Peter

Am 12.02.2015 um 10:12 schrieb Silvestre Losada:
> I dont know if this is a bug or if it is wokring well. I have the following
> annotations.
>
> AnnotationA
>       begin:0
>       ends:8
>        id:1
> AnnotationA
>       begin:4
>       ends:8
>        id:2
> AnnotationA
>       begin: 4
>       ends:8
>        id:3
>
> Then if apply the following ruta
>
> (AnnotationA{-> UNMARK(AnnotationA)}){PARTOFNEQ(AnnotationA)};
>
> The output is
> AnnotationA
>       begin:0
>       ends:8
>        id:1
> AnnotationA
>       begin: 4
>       ends:8
>        id:3
>
> I expect that annotations with id 2 and 3 will be removed. Is there any way
> to remove both
>
> Kind regards
>