Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D12B310684 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22192 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2014 11:43:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 22127 invoked by uid 500); 21 Mar 2014 11:43:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 22119 invoked by uid 99); 21 Mar 2014 11:43:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:43:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of eaepstein@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.179] (HELO mail-vc0-f179.google.com) (209.85.220.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 11:43:32 +0000 Received: by mail-vc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id ij19so2447739vcb.38 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 04:43:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LS7w6wv2mtSgMaXErX2tn0C2+5zC8tYtC5u364H6sOY=; b=oJDXuh0y4Sa7t8vF0M4lmFZnVJYLgfb06aT/c+JRdsRlRCTnKi5h7aXqjHuYX1iqY2 dDYBE4X+qXxVOMPTMOF05grYGMNdJxRVJGXGYe4QIyTzDgoILJ04denVsupo/SIVnvga SLS26RHbg07LOT13OMm2LDLMOqMhUboQZJL1BLbpgpbOhwhpZbH8N8v1A0n1Sad1vgiP Ulypcy/lx88I5mPj/jAik3TVfq8LLO7LtwWsMQkoQkFOpLjeclNB0StgiMyqviP19QxS HIOqKJz53dpORtdqSsQVI6Jq3lSSFR7ZDY8PC5E5GThvHR1b1m6GpZf+EJOMjrE1Rasf dzcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.200.6 with SMTP id eu6mr7091467vcb.35.1395402191447; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 04:43:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.97.130 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 04:43:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <532BD841.2010705@orkash.com> References: <532BD841.2010705@orkash.com> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 07:43:11 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ducc Problems From: Eddie Epstein To: user@uima.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d6612f0aac604f51c63a9 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b5d6612f0aac604f51c63a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 A short discussion about Cas Consumers is at http://uima.apache.org/d/uima-ducc-1.0.0/duccbook.html#x1-1300008.3 Individual Work Items may be treated as collections. The Work Item CAS can be used to trigger collection process complete for these collections. See http://uima.apache.org/d/uima-ducc-1.0.0/duccbook.html#x1-1340008.5.2 Eddie On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:12 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote: > > Hi all, > > DUCC does not call collectionProcessComplete method of Cas Consumer. Hence > we can not attempt batch processing in cas consumer and it increases our > process timing. Is there any other option for that or is it a bug in DUCC? > > Thanks in advance > > -- > Reshu Agarwal > > --047d7b5d6612f0aac604f51c63a9--