Return-Path: 
 <user-return-5267-apmail-uima-user-archive=uima.apache.org@uima.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7302B108DD
	for <apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:03:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 87453 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2013 10:03:00 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org
Received: (qmail 87421 invoked by uid 500); 12 Aug 2013 10:03:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@uima.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@uima.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@uima.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.uima.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org
Received: (qmail 87411 invoked by uid 99); 12 Aug 2013 10:02:59 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:02:59 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of richard.eckart@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.182 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.182] (HELO mail-ea0-f182.google.com)
 (209.85.215.182)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 10:02:54 +0000
Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id o10so3337187eaj.27
        for <user@uima.apache.org>; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 03:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
        bh=9How64YrYXPB+/DoHAQ8SMFKXHFwV6ljqMjAk6oDY9c=;
        b=VRpEGxmLHLTloKKU655J21cGLwNPxtBsSVlrIxwALc1+g62yJyBJvZ3uhNO9s6s9YS
         wbgOEvK28Xtn8LAswG2cyshz+QzR0q8WwyRLdnBK9B7g9pYeATvP2invStp4p5W046em
         rElr/j1Je+BKFz9wNez7elIUisNsbV3D6PoecSm8sy5j72SH5OAbP+7sIbmV7hPDjWB1
         XLUt++qaC37yHAFlGOSUDP0Yb+518/O4Szj83OI0Q4bzms9y2yBc9ARlOHQnjCLzkwWb
         HA4gajyj9/VXmLU2UEtHRzA0mDUJTGpHpYqSpKWdjAO/jLUFU91ufZD+E91uTJkUVtyl
         sM/w==
X-Received: by 10.14.205.200 with SMTP id j48mr12392794eeo.80.1376301753708;
        Mon, 12 Aug 2013 03:02:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from highfire.ukp.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de
 (macbook-rec.ukp.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de. [130.83.167.192])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 bn13sm55999434eeb.11.2013.08.12.03.02.31
        for <multiple recipients>
        (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
        Mon, 12 Aug 2013 03:02:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: Where is uimafit?
From: Richard Eckart de Castilho <richard.eckart@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMpo0whZ0Vp1EM+afmmxOo=F3RJ1RJRehcGHA8-nqO6rYwcFQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:02:26 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <78D3A665-71D6-4D1A-8B25-D08758875E6A@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMpo0wgNWApYYvN5sAEg9Gh6niFQ-Ac29iMOgPaRjorYbWybjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <C70BC600-389B-4AD2-971F-679BDB831070@gmail.com>
 <CAMpo0whBvVz2v=rKCox6VumRwkn9WVDrfkxrfWRguqHsFRGj6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <E0D55BDF-A7C0-479D-8E9B-B5EBAF96EC05@gmail.com>
 <CAMpo0whZ0Vp1EM+afmmxOo=F3RJ1RJRehcGHA8-nqO6rYwcFQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: user@uima.apache.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Hi,

only the legacy module of uimaFIT 2.x should have a dependency on =
uimaFIT 1.x.
The artifact "uimafit-core" doesn't show uimafit 1.x in its dependency
hierarchy. Can you check your dependency hierarchy to check where
1.x is drawn in?

-- Richard

Am 12.08.2013 um 11:48 schrieb Roberto Franchini <franchini@celi.it>:

> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:50 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho
> <richard.eckart@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Am 30.07.2013 um 18:43 schrieb Roberto Franchini <franchini@celi.it>:
>>=20
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho
>>> <richard.eckart@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> I cannot tell you a day, but it is not going to be long before the
>>>> uimaFIT 2.0.0 release.
>>>>=20
> [cut]
>=20
> Hi,
> today, after updating to uima 2.4.2, all my tests were broken.
> It seems that uimafit (from apache) needs uimafit (google code =
legacy).
> Last Friday all was working right, so I guess that this dep wa added
> after friday.
> So I addded the dependency to uimafit(legacy) to my poms.
> Is there a way to avoid this dependency request?
> Thanks a lot, cheers,
> FRANK
> --=20
> Roberto Franchini
> The impossible is inevitable.
> http://www.celi.it                     http://www.blogmeter.it
> http://github.com/celi-uim       http://github.com/robfrank
> Tel +39.011.562.71.15
> jabber:ro.franchini@gmail.com skype:ro.franchini tw:@robfrankie