Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CE93105DC for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 75996 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2013 15:48:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 75810 invoked by uid 500); 29 Jul 2013 15:48:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 75801 invoked by uid 99); 29 Jul 2013 15:48:23 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:48:23 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of uimaee@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.44] (HELO mail-oa0-f44.google.com) (209.85.219.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 15:48:18 +0000 Received: by mail-oa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id l20so9889673oag.31 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:47:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=jBFV5FajdkWYbGPzc1hIXTSt7wu2rk36PlABol/cuhE=; b=tjqKyaompW9QmWEyN5c3rFP5l9HUXNWOWbZGmQbH9ahPNBRtl6as2RgDJW3vBV4YOx oeg2TanmwWBBspWL1e1omfQpVDrDlvp5htFsrHbona+qE+bQHHiZh9LKGj+TO2R5+1qe HOQgVej2je7l9w55/jFzQ4m9mtUNXPdgXn7e34ONr82125/JBVnSle2LQoZH4UtJN9y0 HfskB7JToUrx0OBXjnVOGDox2fvsMA4R7uUHv0jJDrBgDznhEOatCDg0DkjLVi80rH8W X0IIAsR5VBkZcUEKwPaE1IPd10FyJevAa+s0Cej0TU4WNXjFlgWnjakc2lgc9rs+uxxP gf5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.98.233 with SMTP id el9mr33863073oeb.46.1375112877778; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.14.10 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 08:47:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51F6062B.60905@orkash.com> References: <51E65773.2090307@orkash.com> <51E809DD.9050900@schor.com> <51E82076.4080405@schor.com> <51E909BF.2060006@orkash.com> <51EE7675.8000801@orkash.com> <51EF540A.2080608@orkash.com> <51F110B0.1090809@orkash.com> <51F1F4D7.4090601@orkash.com> <51F6062B.60905@orkash.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 11:47:57 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: single broker and multiple remote system From: Jaroslaw Cwiklik To: user@uima.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0118409e9b2c7204e2a86a75 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e0118409e9b2c7204e2a86a75 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Could you clarify "... for processing I want to use different systems resources....". JC On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 2:05 AM, reshu.agarwal wrote: > Hi, > > My main problem is to use single broker for message transport but for > processing I want to use different systems resources. > > like you(JC) said,"If I understand your scenario, you only need one > broker.Services can be deployed an different machines and point to the same > queue (endpoint) and broker (brokerURL) defined in the deployment > descriptor". > > So, How can I configure this scenario. > > > > > On 07/26/2013 06:42 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote: > >> Do you want to share your code across nodes? If so, use Network File >> System >> (NFS) >> >> JC >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 12:02 AM, reshu.agarwal > >**wrote: >> >> Yes JC, you are rightly understand my scenario and I also want to put my >>> code on only one machine. But how can I implement that? >>> >>> -- >>> Reshu Agarwal >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 07/25/2013 08:02 PM, Jaroslaw Cwiklik wrote: >>> >>> If I understand your scenario, you only need one broker.Services can be >>>> deployed an different machines and point to the same >>>> queue (endpoint) and broker (brokerURL) defined in the deployment >>>> descriptor. >>>> >>>> JC >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:49 AM, reshu.agarwal < >>>> reshu.agarwal@orkash.com> >>>> **wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>>> I want to consume the memory of more then 1 machines but start the >>>>> broker >>>>> service only on 1 machine. >>>>> >>>>> Is this possible to start system-1 broker and deploy 5 remote services >>>>> from system-1 machine on 5 different machine{system-2,system-3, >>>>> ....,system-6} which create queues to system-1 broker but use the >>>>> memory >>>>> of >>>>> their machines{system-2,system-3, ....,system-6} for processing? >>>>> >>>>> As I understand, the remote services deployment decision is based on >>>>> the >>>>> broker url. So, If I deploy services from system-1 using system-1 >>>>> broker >>>>> url, it will consume only system-1 memory. >>>>> >>>>> But, If I deploy services from system-1 using the system-2 broker url >>>>> then >>>>> I must start the system-2 broker to consume memory of system-2 and to >>>>> deploy the service. >>>>> >>>>> Am I right? So, How can this possible? >>>>> >>>>> Is it possible to make system-1 broker to work as system-2 broker too? >>>>> How? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks in advance. >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Reshu Agarwal >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> > > -- > Thanks and Regards, > Reshu Agarwal > > --089e0118409e9b2c7204e2a86a75--