Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F01A2DCF2 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1294 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2012 08:04:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 1244 invoked by uid 500); 30 Nov 2012 08:04:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 1196 invoked by uid 99); 30 Nov 2012 08:04:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:04:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tommaso.teofili@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.47] (HELO mail-pa0-f47.google.com) (209.85.220.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 08:04:25 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id fa10so155574pad.6 for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:04:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=lsjaNXvywM/2bF5sJ92F31vLDOkEu18e/7jqgbY1T2g=; b=vJtIOYO5/cFWkIxLXKVIMk539UlTqLYywKmLwMxDxcOz1qjYfVMd+GGmSMhVV2Mt2r 1KYns+jJmqi+VD/IubGsmWra6z6vKew2Q2Y/oceAjwu/XN+ZCzW2q2E96Roh1Q4LKXA1 TkbdXyc2GsMrWXrTrELhGbtIv5MRYoTjRpUdbGV0tfTME8RQkyG3XifYo9aywJuuFXxi 8B1nCehpXx1QFF3ZVF9MiHYRbHMZ5qCwWAh41dyBzl6sXFJL516KyevUzrYLAZCTZhyf WnpDo3r/wCn5hqXdRxqoT4zvqVynMALv1/imb++9QoQQ2qMOzE68sS2UrLUBAsIfJRAI XG1g== Received: by 10.68.230.66 with SMTP id sw2mr3317117pbc.119.1354262644066; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:04:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.24.136 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 00:03:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Tommaso Teofili Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:03:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Solr 4 and UIMA To: user@uima.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b339e73d5094e04cfb1d753 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b339e73d5094e04cfb1d753 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Which integration are you talking about? The one in Solr (the UpdateRequestProcessor that extracts metadata with UIMA to populate some fields and then index the received document in Solr) [1] or the one in UIMA Solrcas (the CASConsumer which takes some of the existing annotations in the received CAS and writes them in a Solr instance) [2]? The first one is available for Solr4 while Solrcas is still at 3.6.1 (but we plan to update that shortly). Hope this helps, Tommaso [1] : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/branch_4x/solr/contrib/uima/ [2] : http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/addons/trunk/Solrcas/ 2012/11/30 mike.vogel > Does the integration with UIMA work with Solr 4? > > --047d7b339e73d5094e04cfb1d753--