Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.223.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1352190387.62508.YahooMailNeo@web161205.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
References: <1352124702.56682.YahooMailNeo@web161205.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
	<OF72C4093F.9E17B054-ON85257AAD.0059D8AF-85257AAD.0059F940@us.ibm.com>
	<1352190387.62508.YahooMailNeo@web161205.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:48:48 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CA+-fM0sZ6w87ooEHBe=WB=_YjWpKLcvuuDVzF8jB729P9Yyd7A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: f-score evaluation tool?
From: Julien Nioche <lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com>
To: user@uima.apache.org, Yasen Kiprov <yasenkiprov@yahoo.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f502dc6409a7004cdd08210

--e89a8f502dc6409a7004cdd08210
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi Yasen


> P.S. I come from the GATE world and I believe UIMA will give me better
> performance and more options for distribution and parallel processing.
>

Without going in an in-depth comparison : Behemoth (
https://github.com/DigitalPebble/behemoth) can be used to deploy your UIMA
or GATE pipelines over a Hadoop cluster so both tools are on an equal
footing from that point of view. UIMA-AS can be used for non-batch,
low-latency processing, there is no equivalent for GATE but building one
with e.g. Storm would not be too difficult to do.  UIMA is likely to be
faster than GATE indeed however it has no equivalent of JAPE.

Julien

-- 
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering

http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble

--e89a8f502dc6409a7004cdd08210--