Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB56BD287 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:26:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 94938 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2012 10:26:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 94767 invoked by uid 500); 6 Nov 2012 10:26:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 94547 invoked by uid 99); 6 Nov 2012 10:26:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:26:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [132.187.3.35] (HELO mailrelay.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de) (132.187.3.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Nov 2012 10:26:08 +0000 Received: from virusscan-slb.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay-slb.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B45876F2F for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:25:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virusscan-slb.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EEE76F5B for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:25:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at uni-wuerzburg.de Received: from mailmaster.uni-wuerzburg.de ([10.101.19.2]) by localhost (vmail002.slb.uni-wuerzburg.de [10.101.19.142]) (amavisd-new, port 10225) with ESMTP id njymLnl1oHja for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:25:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [132.187.15.65] (win6065d.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.15.65]) by mailmaster.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0694A76F58 for ; Tue, 6 Nov 2012 11:25:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5098E5A9.2020602@uni-wuerzburg.de> Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 11:25:45 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Kl=FCgl?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@uima.apache.org Subject: Re: f-score evaluation tool? References: <1352124702.56682.YahooMailNeo@web161205.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <1352190387.62508.YahooMailNeo@web161205.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Without going in an in-depth comparison : Behemoth ( > https://github.com/DigitalPebble/behemoth) can be used to deploy your UIMA > or GATE pipelines over a Hadoop cluster so both tools are on an equal > footing from that point of view. UIMA-AS can be used for non-batch, > low-latency processing, there is no equivalent for GATE but building one > with e.g. Storm would not be too difficult to do. UIMA is likely to be > faster than GATE indeed however it has no equivalent of JAPE. > Well, I hope that this will change soon (the equivalent of JAPE, of course). Peter