Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A5F02D206 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 5168 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2012 14:13:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-uima-user-archive@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 4778 invoked by uid 500); 30 Oct 2012 14:13:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@uima.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@uima.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@uima.apache.org Received: (qmail 4741 invoked by uid 99); 30 Oct 2012 14:13:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:13:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [139.18.1.28] (HELO v3.rz.uni-leipzig.de) (139.18.1.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:13:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by v3.rz.uni-leipzig.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183C02C04E for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:12:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at v3-ul Received: from v3.rz.uni-leipzig.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (v3.rz.uni-leipzig.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6RQpE0I6CWid for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:12:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from isun.informatik.uni-leipzig.de (isun.informatik.uni-leipzig.de [139.18.13.50]) by v3.rz.uni-leipzig.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25DD2C04C for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:12:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.informatik.uni-leipzig.de (smtp.informatik.uni-leipzig.de [139.18.13.51]) by isun.informatik.uni-leipzig.de (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9UEAk1n014734 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:10:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from [141.57.112.20] ([141.57.112.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.informatik.uni-leipzig.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q9UECxvW008616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:12:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <508FE066.70201@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:12:54 +0100 From: Andreas Niekler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user@uima.apache.org Subject: operationalProperties Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Dear List, can please anyone comment on the effect that the following settings in a analysisEngineDescription have? I wonder if they change the order of the processing in a multi-threaded run of a cpe. Does is change anything if i set those parameters or is it just to control things from outside? I ask because i need to log which files where able to run through all processes Annotators since many of the annotators contanct web services. In the cas consumer i than write the list to a file. But what if there is one process that says modifiesCas=false. If an error happens in there does the CAS Consumer care and end the Chain or does it just don't care? IS there a documentation on this? true true false Thank you all -- Andreas Niekler, Dipl. Ing. (FH) NLP Group | Department of Computer Science University of Leipzig Johannisgasse 26 | 04103 Leipzig mail: aniekler@informatik.uni-leipzig.deg.de